Some cheapskates here, get what you pay for. I bet those of you paying less than $100 a month are not getting 4G LTE speeds at all.
$80 a month (before all the taxes and crap) unlimited (everything) with Sprint. With my HTC M9, my slowest speed using "SpeedTest" was 30.92 Mb. Fastest was 48.58 Mb. Is that not 4g LTE speeds?
Some cheapskates here, get what you pay for. I bet those of you paying less than $100 a month are not getting 4G LTE speeds at all.
$80 a month (before all the taxes and crap) unlimited (everything) with Sprint. With my HTC M9, my slowest speed using "SpeedTest" was 30.92 Mb. Fastest was 48.58 Mb. Is that not 4g LTE speeds?
Some cheapskates here, get what you pay for. I bet those of you paying less than $100 a month are not getting 4G LTE speeds at all.
$80 a month (before all the taxes and crap) unlimited (everything) with Sprint. With my HTC M9, my slowest speed using "SpeedTest" was 30.92 Mb. Fastest was 48.58 Mb. Is that not 4g LTE speeds?
Some cheapskates here, get what you pay for. I bet those of you paying less than $100 a month are not getting 4G LTE speeds at all.
$80 a month (before all the taxes and crap) unlimited (everything) with Sprint. With my HTC M9, my slowest speed using "SpeedTest" was 30.92 Mb. Fastest was 48.58 Mb. Is that not 4g LTE speeds?
The issue will persist as long as the majority will still buy and use their shitty plans. If companies like these would experience how it feels to lose, let's say 40-50% of their customers in a short period of time, they would change their pricing policy.
The issue will persist as long as the majority will still buy and use their shitty plans. If companies like these would experience how it feels to lose let say 40-50% of their customers in a short period of time, they would change their pricing policy.
Cricket does not have "the best" phones when compared to ATT so for those of use that wants better phones getting third rate phones may be for some but not for all.