OK. Sombody please 'splain this to me.
The Nvidia GTX 260 core 216 55nm (the only card in the history of GPUs whos name is longer than its part number) contains:
216 cores @576 mhz
GDDR3 on a 448 bit bus with a mem clock of ~2000
32 ROPs
and is on PCIe 2.0
The ATI Radeon 4870 contains:
800 cores @ 750 mhz
GDDR5 on a 256 bit bus with a clock of 900
16 ROPs
and is also on PCIe 2.0
How do these cards perform on par?
Dose having 1/2 the ROPs and mem bus actually slow down 800 SPs to the performance of 216? If so, why dosn't ATI just bump up the mem bus to 512 and add some ROPs? What archatectural faux pas, as it seems, cripples 800 SPs that much?
Also, the Nvidia site has a Fermi (GT300) page for the who ever is curious. Oh, and for the next person who needs GT300 rumors, it makes waffles and massages your feet.
The Nvidia GTX 260 core 216 55nm (the only card in the history of GPUs whos name is longer than its part number) contains:
216 cores @576 mhz
GDDR3 on a 448 bit bus with a mem clock of ~2000
32 ROPs
and is on PCIe 2.0
The ATI Radeon 4870 contains:
800 cores @ 750 mhz
GDDR5 on a 256 bit bus with a clock of 900
16 ROPs
and is also on PCIe 2.0
How do these cards perform on par?
Dose having 1/2 the ROPs and mem bus actually slow down 800 SPs to the performance of 216? If so, why dosn't ATI just bump up the mem bus to 512 and add some ROPs? What archatectural faux pas, as it seems, cripples 800 SPs that much?
Also, the Nvidia site has a Fermi (GT300) page for the who ever is curious. Oh, and for the next person who needs GT300 rumors, it makes waffles and massages your feet.