Battlefield 3 fail :/

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

michaelxps

Honorable
Apr 13, 2012
94
0
10,630
Downloaded it but its LAGGING LIKE CRAZY even on low settings, I'm guessing its my CPU

Athlon X2 II 3.0 Ghz
6 gigs of ram
radeon HD 6670 graphics card

if I upgrade to an athlon X3 would that fix the problem with battlefield?

I run Rift, WoW, Rage, and Diablo 3 perfectly fine on high/ultra settings
 

Alex The PC Gamer

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2007
981
0
19,060
Ok, in all seriousness. Michael, what these guys are trying to say is that your GPU isn't meant for gaming. It's meant for handleling multimedia. When both Nvidia and AMD release a new generation of videocards (yours being 6000 series) they make them for all purposes (from general workstation purposes to enthousiastic gaming). The range is generally followed in the following order:

HD Radeon 64xx, 65xx, 66xx: are generally for multimedia purposes and they're also the cheapest (in price, not quality). So John Doe who only uses his computer for watching movies/online videos can pay cheaper and get a smooth experience.

HD Radeon 67xx is considered mid range gpu allowing you to play certain games (such as the titles you've mentioned that don't require a lot of GPU power but use a fair amount of GPU Rendering (more than the previous range can handle). This range would cost a little more than the sub range but will give you more power allowing you to play certain games.

HD Radeon 68xx: is meant for gaming. They're a lot more expensive but will give you pretty all the power you need to run almost every game out there at pretty high settings (and 1080p).

HD Radeon 69xx: is usually a 2GPU card (built for gaming enthusiast to like to spend loads of money). These are extremely expensive and i look at them as "Bragging rights" cards as oppose to good value cards.

Ironically, from one generation to the next, you'll see (for example) a 5870 get twice the FPS of a 6670 (Proof in these benchmarks: http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-6670-review/5


So you see, your GPU wasn't meant for rendering DX10 or DX11 battle simulation (BF3). It was meant to watch porn on the internets. Sorry to disappoint.

As I said in my first response (post way above), BF3 is a beast, if you plan on playing BF3 at 40FPS at high or above settings, you'll need to consider upgrading your CPU to a QUAD and upgrading your GPU to at least a 67xx or 68xx range.
 

casualcolors

Distinguished
Apr 18, 2011
2,043
0
19,960
6900's mostly single gpu cards barring the 6990 but your point still stands. 6950 and 6970 were high end mainstream cards. It's also the beginning range for playing BF3 on high settings with 60 fps in most circumstances. 6870 specifically is the first card in ati's line to start approaching these in terms of performance without nearly the same price premium though.
 

bwrlane

Distinguished
Oct 5, 2010
449
0
18,860
Michaelxps, you ask a question and then insult all the people who have honestly tried to help you. You did create an entertaining thread though, I won't take that away from you. What with your lame jokes, stunning ignorance and playground mentality. But most of the laughs are at your expense I'm afraid.

Anyway, back on topic... The 6670 is not a good gaming GPU. It is one generation old and was considered a low end gaming part even then. It is inferior to the 5870, 4870 and probably also the 3870. It is probably ok to play on low and whether that's enough is a matter for you.

Your CPU is also weak but you're right in one sense. If you have a low end GPU like yours, you can usually reduce the settings to the point where it's playable. However, if it's the CPU you're pretty much stuck. Therefore, if both are weak (as in your case) you might just achieve minimal playability by upgrading the CPU. But if I were you, I'd consider upgrading both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.