slomo4sho :
Any particular reason why only the 2500K was overclocked in the CPU benchmarks and why the FX-4170 was benchmarked in place of the 4300 or 6300?
I'd guess that was done to show frequency scaling on four cores, and to compare it to the slower hexacore with the same architecture.
The 4300 or the 6300 might not have been tested because Don didn't have them on hand.
Unless you're looking for conspiracy...
jimmysmitty :
itzsnypah :
Why did you use a Titan for the CPU benchmarks when you have the GTX 690 / HD7990 delivering ~30% more FPS?
Because the whole purpose is to test the CPU, not the GPU so it wouldn't matter what GPU there was it was to show where the game stands on CPU cores which it looks like 2 cores 4 threads is not enough really.
True, but even Don notes that the Titan had become a bottleneck beyond the overclocked i5 and the i7.
iknowhowtofixit :
BigMack70 :
Why would they mention Mantle in an article about beta performance?
slomo4sho :
iknowhowtofixit :
Weird that there is absolutely no mention of Mantle when BF4 is going to be the first game to implement it.
Considering that mantle wont be available until December, why would it be mentioned? Especially considering the fact that none of the "new" AMD GPUs were included in the benchmarks...
Cool your jets, people. I didn't say anything about getting performance numbers that are Mantle related or anything. I'm just surprised that it went unmentioned in a BF4 performance article with all of the buzz surrounding Mantle.
Because there's nothing much to talk about, probably. I'm sure they will when the game is launched.
@slomo4sho: Mantle should work with all GCN cards.