Battlefield 4 on 2gb gpu

[theodoristef]

Battlefield 4 on 2gb gpu on ultra ? GTX 760

 

[rubidium]

I am assuming that you have the suitable cpu( whats ur cpu?) which wont bottleneck the gtx 760.Concerning the normal graphical settings, it should be capable of doing this as the recommended gpus were hd 7870 and gtx 660 which are inferior to the gtx 760. Regarding the anti-analysing, i think sadly(as i have a gtx 760 myself), that the gtx 760 wont be able to max it out x8 MSAA, especially on large multiplayer maps as they recommended a 3gb vram AND the normal battlefield 3 consumed maybe 1.7 (some said above 2gb)gb of vram when playing in large 64 players servers in multiplayer. However, this vram usage also depends on the resolution so whats ur resolution. Anyway, if you dont mind getting the aa setting a bit lower than the max, im sure you will be fine with it.

 

[theodoristef]

I am assuming that you have the suitable cpu( whats ur cpu?) which wont bottleneck the gtx 760.Concerning the normal graphical settings, it should be capable of doing this as the recommended gpus were hd 7870 and gtx 660 which are inferior to the gtx 760. Regarding the anti-analysing, i think sadly(as i have a gtx 760 myself), that the gtx 760 wont be able to max it out x8 MSAA, especially on large multiplayer maps as they recommended a 3gb vram AND the normal battlefield 3 consumed maybe 1.7 (some said above 2gb)gb of vram when playing in large 64 players servers in multiplayer. However, this vram usage also depends on the resolution so whats ur resolution. Anyway, if you dont mind getting the aa setting a bit lower than the max, im sure you will be fine with it.

cpu fx 8150 24 inch screen i dont mind if aa at x2 or msaa on x2 or x
4

 

[rubidium]

I am assuming that you have the suitable cpu( whats ur cpu?) which wont bottleneck the gtx 760.Concerning the normal graphical settings, it should be capable of doing this as the recommended gpus were hd 7870 and gtx 660 which are inferior to the gtx 760. Regarding the anti-analysing, i think sadly(as i have a gtx 760 myself), that the gtx 760 wont be able to max it out x8 MSAA, especially on large multiplayer maps as they recommended a 3gb vram AND the normal battlefield 3 consumed maybe 1.7 (some said above 2gb)gb of vram when playing in large 64 players servers in multiplayer. However, this vram usage also depends on the resolution so whats ur resolution. Anyway, if you dont mind getting the aa setting a bit lower than the max, im sure you will be fine with it.

cpu fx 8150 24 inch screen i dont mind if aa at x2 or msaa on x2 or x
4

The gpu will be fine but the cpu will suffer i think. In battlefield 3, he fx-8350 and i5 2500 and above did really good, but the fx 8150 might draw back your performance http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2307366 in battlefield 3
, a difference of 20 fps between the 8150 and i5-2500k ( Note that this in the 64 players servers in intensive battles where cpu will really differ), but in single player, i think you will be fine although i recommend upgrading your cpu.

 

[shadow32]

Yes. Easily.

I have a HD 7850 1GB And it runs BF3 nice on ultra. BF4's specs aren't too far off from BF3's.

Here is a comparison:
http://www.hwcompare.com/14809/geforce-gtx-760-vs-radeon-hd-7850/

Also, some more comparisons if you like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEoQP3Q6gSc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaPMVw4RKZA


Personally, I would wait and get the new AMD card coming out in a few weeks, but that's your choice.

 

[rubidium]

Yes. Easily.

I have a HD 7850 1GB And it runs BF3 nice on ultra. BF4's specs aren't too far off from BF3's.

Here is a comparison:
http://www.hwcompare.com/14809/geforce-gtx-760-vs-radeon-hd-7850/

Also, some more comparisons if you like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEoQP3Q6gSc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaPMVw4RKZA


Personally, I would wait and get the new AMD card coming out in a few weeks, but that's your choice.

I think he has the card already, if he dont, i would recommend waiting for the new series as well, and his cpu cant max it out easily, especially in mp 64 players trust me. By the way, hwcompare is not an accurate website for comparisons, its numbers are correct but different architectures means different scale of numbers, cant compare numbers while having different architecture.

 

[shadow32]

Yes. Easily.

I have a HD 7850 1GB And it runs BF3 nice on ultra. BF4's specs aren't too far off from BF3's.

Here is a comparison:
http://www.hwcompare.com/14809/geforce-gtx-760-vs-radeon-hd-7850/

Also, some more comparisons if you like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEoQP3Q6gSc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaPMVw4RKZA


Personally, I would wait and get the new AMD card coming out in a few weeks, but that's your choice.

I think he has the card already, if he dont, i would recommend waiting for the new series as well, and his cpu cant max it out easily, especially in mp 64 players trust me. By the way, hwcompare is not an accurate website for comparisons, its numbers are correct but different architectures means different scale of numbers, cant compare numbers while having different architecture.

Hence the reason I included gameplays of BF3 which more accurately show how the cards handle a similar game.

 

[theodoristef]

i think i will upgrade to i5 or i7 haswell

 

[The Q6660 Inside]

I am assuming that you have the suitable cpu( whats ur cpu?) which wont bottleneck the gtx 760.Concerning the normal graphical settings, it should be capable of doing this as the recommended gpus were hd 7870 and gtx 660 which are inferior to the gtx 760. Regarding the anti-analysing, i think sadly(as i have a gtx 760 myself), that the gtx 760 wont be able to max it out x8 MSAA, especially on large multiplayer maps as they recommended a 3gb vram AND the normal battlefield 3 consumed maybe 1.7 (some said above 2gb)gb of vram when playing in large 64 players servers in multiplayer. However, this vram usage also depends on the resolution so whats ur resolution. Anyway, if you dont mind getting the aa setting a bit lower than the max, im sure you will be fine with it.

cpu fx 8150 24 inch screen i dont mind if aa at x2 or msaa on x2 or x
4

The gpu will be fine but the cpu will suffer i think. In battlefield 3, he fx-8350 and i5 2500 and above did really good, but the fx 8150 might draw back your performance http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2307366 in battlefield 3
, a difference of 20 fps between the 8150 and i5-2500k ( Note that this in the 64 players servers in intensive battles where cpu will really differ), but in single player, i think you will be fine although i recommend upgrading your cpu.

BF4 is heavily multi threaded and optimized for the 8150 and 8350, single threaded apps caused the 8150 to get its notoriety, which was somewhat fixed with the 8320/8350. What he could do is overclock the 8150 to 4.3 with a HYPER 212 EVO, that is the most cost effective method and will likely do great in BF4, after all the consoles run 8-core AMDs. I am running a 760 with a 920 myself, and its quite good compared to the 4870 it replaced. Unless he is driving 1440p+, his 760 should do just fine. OP, what is your full specs?

 

[rubidium]

I was just talking with someone about this yesterday. Q6660, do you even imagine that bf4 will be more optimized and run badly on an i5? Bf3 didnt even use the 4 cores of the i5 FULLY, so how would bf4 manage to fully use it and overcome this barrier to be more optimized on the multi-threaded AMD cpus. I know the thread is for bf4 specially, but most of the games favors intel and their single core performance. Here are some cpu intensive games that uses mroe than 4 cores and their performance on i5 and fx 8350 BF3 on 64 servers :http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2307366 and arma 3 http://www.techspot.com/review/712-arma-3-benchmarks/page5.html , if you would notice the i5 performs better in both. By the way, i am not experienced with such matter as im not a programmer, but every single person who understands in programming says that devs cant write a game code that utilizes the 8 cores of the ps4 ONCE its released, this is demanding process that would take some time like (1-2 years), so i think till then, the i5 will still be superior to AMD cpus and after that period, they might become equal in performance or AMD will overcome intel idk.

 

[The Q6660 Inside]

I was just talking with someone about this yesterday. Q6660, do you even imagine that bf4 will be more optimized and run badly on an i5? Bf3 didnt even use the 4 cores of the i5 FULLY, so how would bf4 manage to fully use it and overcome this barrier to be more optimized on the multi-threaded AMD cpus. I know the thread is for bf4 specially, but most of the games favors intel and their single core performance. Here are some cpu intensive games that uses mroe than 4 cores and their performance on i5 and fx 8350 BF3 on 64 servers :http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2307366 and arma 3 http://www.techspot.com/review/712-arma-3-benchmarks/page5.html , if you would notice the i5 performs better in both. By the way, i am not experienced with such matter as im not a programmer, but every single person who understands in programming says that devs cant write a game code that utilizes the 8 cores of the ps4 ONCE its released, this is demanding process that would take some time like (1-2 years), so i think till then, the i5 will still be superior to AMD cpus and after that period, they might become equal in performance or AMD will overcome intel idk.

We can argue all we want, BF3 was coded for up to six cores in use, the 81XX/83XX will get an advantage this generation. After all, DICE stated BF4 it will be optimized for AMD.