Battlefield V Closed Alpha: Early Benchmark Results

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nvidia had no time to have their tweaks installed?(cough cough gimpworks). Regardless of what stage the development is, Nvidia should be optimized from start even during early phases of development not during alpha stage or later. Isn't this an Nvidia title?
 
Rx580 does not perform 33% better that the 1060, it performs 50% better that the 1060.. also pretty stupid if this is an nVidia game they should have the optimizations and not AMD.. there for i don't buy the AMD has serious performance issues.. serious for nVidia yes because they are being beaten right now
 


Support your claims with verifiable and validated citation.
 


Not sure what planet you are on, but here on planet Earth in the GPU market, AMD only wins over nVidia in the lower tiered GPUs. From the GTX 1070 on up, nVidia > AMD in bang for the buck including power consumption and overclockability for extra FPS gains.
 
this artikel is about Battlefield right? so i'm talking about that, and at this moment AMD is much faster in the new Battlefield than nVidia.. never did i say AMD is better than nVidia overall... also to thy guy who said to support my claims...its simple Math, the 33% is simply wrong...
 


It's wrong according to what source? If you make a claim, support it with actual evidence and not anecdote. That's all I'm saying.
 
Hmmm.... so everyone and their dog is still paying premium $$$$ for poorly coded games running an obsolete API.

As long as you keep buying junk Dice will keep coding junk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS