@Wisecracker: You're
almost correct, and i say almost because you're comparing a quad-Jaguar part to a dual-Silvermont part.
[strike]Also, look the WinZip EZ and CPU results again, their order is different on both charts. Dual-Silvermont has a ridiculous advantage over Kabini in the EZ test, and is pretty similar in the CPU test. Heck, even the OpenCL results are very close.[/strike]
Those are definitely not comparable, i think the file sets are different, i don't see how the ivy bridge based celeron can beat a core i3. Or, how Bay Trail can beat pentium and Ci3 in the EZ test.
Look at the AnandTech piece (i'm reading the TR article right now, hadn't till now) to see what happens when you go quad-Silvermont.
It's absolutely crazy what Intel has done here. Crazy. Reminds you of how mature x86 is, compared to ARMv7.
Extremely interested to see how the Apple A7 compares to the Z3770, though i think it would be a better idea to compare it to a Z3600 part.
I think Apple and Intel have both outdone themselves. Former was a surprise, latter not so much.
And yeah, in terms of GPU performance, Kabini >> Bay Trail.
TR seems to pretty much confirm AT's tests:
Note: Epic Citadel is On-screen, so is the first 3DMark; the Bay Trail system has a 1440p display, Nexus 7 and TF Infinity are 1080p.