I always look forward to post/articles about reviews or suggestions from toms. While I find this article useful, it becomes a bit skewd for those that live near a microcenter (like myself) and can purchase just about any cpu listed for 20-40% cheaper. I do think web prices should matter, but where people lives matter too. What about any UK gamers? Prices are much different over there. I have a few friends that tell me the price of a 9800gt is still $220 us. (over there)
Additionally, Many of us are on a budget sometimes and getting something good and cheap is great! But what not many realize is the difference in say spending $150 on a cpu and say... $170, many times results in a 20% faster cpu. (not always) And to me, $20 bucks is a meal, or a movie. And if your going to have your machine for years, come on. The possible performance increase is worth $20.
Just remember this what picking out any computer part. People want 3 things from it. They want it good, cheap, and fast. PICK 2
good and cheap = not fast
good and fast = not cheap
fast and cheap = not good.
Lastly, It would be nice if charts or a rating system was attached to articles like this. If toms tells me that a certain cpu is the winner of $100 and another is at $120. What's there differences? Is the $20 worth the difference and why? How much more fps or performance am I getting for that? Winning the crown for a certain price bracket does nothing for me if I don't know why. Maybe these brackets should only be at $100/$200/$300+ ranges?
Anyways, sorry for the rant, I don't normally rant... but today, I've just had way too much coffee.
Keep doing what your doing toms! While sometimes it's hit or miss, the effort, research and dedication to your readers is very appreciated! From my side of the fence, I love ya!