Hellfire13 :
ChumP :
Well that H310 mobo that you posted has a 4+1 phase design, while the msi b360m has a similar phase design(it looks like a 4+3 to me).
So I don't get how that h310 is more suitable than the b360m for the i9 9900k.
Also you should upgrade from a 50$ motherboard when you're buying a 500$ CPU... I've never seen anyone run an i9 on a b360 mobo.
Even this is cheap...
PCPartPicker part list /
Price breakdown by merchant
Motherboard: Gigabyte - H310M A Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($49.49 @ Amazon)
Total: $49.49
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-11-02 08:36 EDT-0400
Why do you think it doesnt show on pcpp compatible motherboard list with 9900k???
This discussion was pointless in the first place. He's looking for a cheap motherboard, right?
Obviously that's not suitable for a 9900k, this CPU is hard to handle even on higher end motherboards.
Usually with cheap motherboards you'll be looking for processors that won't oc and won't be that power hungry(e.g. i3 8100,i5 8400,i7 8700). So... bringing the i9 9900k into the discussion of future upgrading makes no sense to me.... especially when you're trying to get a budget board.
Also you said that:
Above 2 boards are compatible.
This includes that ASRock H310M - HDV that you listed... After that you said:
The board doesnt have enough CPU power phase to support 8 cores at turbo properly. It can only support at base clocks.
So you're basically saying that the ASRock H310M can provide enough power for the 9900k to turbo and the MSI B360M won't.
These 2 motherboards provide the same number of phases (4 to be exact) dedicated to the CPU.... so the power delivery is the same for both. So you're incorrect in this statement basically saying that the ASRock H310M is more adequate to run a 9900k than the MSI B360M.