allanitomwesh :
Crashman :
allanitomwesh :
"And CaseLabs certainly has the “quality of materials” situation wrapped up with its 2.3 mm-thick aluminum chassis with 1.6 mm-thick exterior panels."
This alone (being the most premium) was enough for the In Win to win,yet the Caselabs does not?
Your mistake. The In Win Did Not Win.
It qualified for the finals did it not? Yet of the three here in part 2 none has,If I read correctly? Enlighten me.
Yes, so did the Caselabs case
You don't seem to understand that all three cases in Part 2 qualified for further consideration, but that only one of the four previous cases were even considered high-end. The In-Win case looked better in Part 1 because the other three were so cheaply made that they don't touch the "premium" market.