OK, so I know that low refresh rates cause eye pain. I know that 60Hz is bad in the U.S. for monitors under flourecent lighting as well, because the monitor is flashing nearly the same frequency as the lights. I also know that relatively speaking, higher frequencies cause less eye fatigue.
So the question is, which is better, 85Hz or 90Hz. I would assume 90Hz, except that it's exactly 1.5x the rate at which the lights flicker...so is 85Hz better.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
So the question is, which is better, 85Hz or 90Hz. I would assume 90Hz, except that it's exactly 1.5x the rate at which the lights flicker...so is 85Hz better.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>