Well this is my point "best on the market" doesn't really mean best on the market. Because in the grand scheme of things, how you apply it is usually more important than what exactly you apply (as long as it's not awful really cheap stuff).Ok thanks,but whitch thermal paste is best for laptop?
I dont talk now about mx4 or liquid metal but in general Whitch one is best on the market? Thanks
i wouldn't recommend liquid metal for standard users/gamers basically only for trying to break overclocking records or other extreme cases imo.. some people might not mind the hassle and risk of using it. as for the best ones on the market:Ok thanks,but whitch thermal paste is best for laptop?
I dont talk now about mx4 or liquid metal but in general Whitch one is best on the market? Thanks
Thermal paste in reality, doesn't make the world of difference.
personally i don't entirely agree with this, some thermal pastes especially the cheap ones can have a fairly significant temperature difference, and as the OP implied it'd also be used on the GPU so imo it's worth dishing out a few extra $ for stuff that's proven to have decent temps which i recon is why he is asking this here in the first place >..>If anything was "buy what's cheapest" and then "set it and forget it" it's thermal paste.
personally i don't entirely agree with this, some thermal pastes especially the cheap ones can have a fairly significant temperature difference
I'm not exaggerating, you can use toothpaste! I have tried. You have to replace it more often and obviously isn't as good as thermal paste, but it works.We are free to agree to disagree.
I have never, over the course of decades, seen any significant difference between the cheapest and the most expensive thermal pastes when applied correctly.
You can be certain that OEMs are not doing anything other than buying this stuff on spec, and the spec is awfully simple - transfer heat. Virtually all of it is shiny silver-gray very thin-bodied paste, just a bit beyond liquid to hold shape for transfer, but designed to allow itself to be "smashed into place" when the processor is pushed on to the heat sink.
I liked PC Tailor's analogy - you could probably use toothpaste (though I wouldn't). It's just not that important as far as brand goes. It's a dirt basic technology that anyone that is in the business of making it can make well.
i get where you're coming from but from my perspective a few degrees(some extreme cases I've seen temperature differences from anywhere from 1-15 degrees, which obviously can vary depending on amount more than brand) for a few extra dollars is worth it, people spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars on computer(s)/parts so spending an extra $5 on a "better" thermal paste imo is worth it 😉We are free to agree to disagree.
I have never, over the course of decades, seen any significant difference between the cheapest and the most expensive thermal pastes when applied correctly.
You can be certain that OEMs are not doing anything other than buying this stuff on spec, and the spec is awfully simple - transfer heat. Virtually all of it is shiny silver-gray very thin-bodied paste, just a bit beyond liquid to hold shape for transfer, but designed to allow itself to be "smashed into place" when the processor is pushed on to the heat sink.
I liked PC Tailor's analogy - you could probably use toothpaste (though I wouldn't). It's just not that important as far as brand goes. It's a dirt basic technology that anyone that is in the business of making it can make well.
I agree. Just remember to not go overboard. Because ultimately, there really isn't that much differenceYes ofcorse,if you can spend 1000$ on pc then you can buy good thermal paste
I will buy one of this (better ones)