Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (
More info?)
"@ndrew" <andrewratinternodedotondotnet> wrote in message
news:40a572b1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> Andy Rose wrote:
>
> >
> > > I can give you an answer but am interested in your opinion of your
> > > current card with Far Cry?
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > @ndrew
> > >
> >
> > Well, too slow. Much too slow. Single player 1024x768 all set to low
> > is... playable. Anything higher will start making it choppy.
> > Multiplayer requires high accuracy response, that I cant seem to get
> > from this card.
> > The Ti4200 has served me well so far, but after buying FarCry
> > yeseterday, I feel like playing stoneage hardware.
> >
> > So what's your opinion, then?
> > andy
>
>
> Well if you are after a card that will do DX9 then the Radeon 9800 Pro
> and up is your best bet. Far Cry will play fine with this card.
> Nvidia have a DX9 implementation with their FX cards that is clunky and
> nowhere near as good as the ATI true DX9 implementation (they are a lot
> slower).
>
> The next iterations of both ATI and Nvidia cards are about to hit the
> shelves and both should also play the game fine .. I am sure .. albeit
> you will be paying big bucks for them.
>
> My recommendation would be any Radeon from the 9800 Pro up.
>
> regards
>
> @ndrew
>
>
That is strange I have and are still playing FarCry with the a Ti4200 64 8X
; the reviews say it is actually a couple frames better than the 128. I hae
have a barton 2500 with DDR3200 ram clocked and normal speeds and find the
game play very fun ; but If i could part with the cash i would go ATI
also.Have been very disapointed with the new NV cards lately. My 2 cents
hope it helps
