BF4 Tech Specs-Annoying

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

buster108

Distinguished
Aug 4, 2013
211
8
18,715
I find it very annoying that I do not reach the recommended requirements for Battlefield 4. I have
Intel Core i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, GTX 770 2bg, Windows 7.

Now I find that because ,probably Microsoft payed EA some money, I have windows 7 64 bit .....I don't meet the recommended requirements because I need windows 8 64 bit. As if there is any difference....really? Come on. Well...... no game changing difference and then the other reason is that I need 3gb video ram. OK firstly I have a GTX 770 A BEAST of all that is insane and then I'm not like running a two monitor setup here.

All I'm saying is, will be able to run battlefield 4 @60 fps on ultra right? I can settle for 50fps+

 
Solution


yeah it runs it better i guess if you call maybe a frame or 2 better (and that isnt on every game either) but then everything else on 8 functions horribly there is a reason microsoft had to pull 7 off of store shelves (because they knew they couldnt sell a box of crap labeled windows 8) espcially once people could compare the two.


windows 9 needs to be good, because then they'll be following their pattern of good then bad then good then bad, OS's.
 


Well maybe if they start thinking smart which they aren't going to maybe we would get good Windows but the only way for them to create new good Windows is to go low on money so they need to make something good to earn moneyz and then they will make the new Good Windows
 


yh i get 50-70 fps in beta on ultra m8.....
 


Well again its beta the graphics are not final and if its the same thing as BF3 beta then you probably know what will happen. If not then BF3 beta worked much better then final and most of the updates fucked it up even more.