[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]Bing was new. Lots of people decided to try it out.However, most of them had brains in their heads, and preferred Google's fast loading, accurate, low on ads searchengine over Bings.In other words, now that nearly the whole world knows Google rocks, only the Bing fans and geeks stay with MS' solution of inaccurate links, spam, ads, and amounts of unnecessary data.[/citation]
Huh? You say that Google is good because it is low on ads then complain about Bing being bad because it also has ads? I just typed in "muscle gain" on Bing and got 3 ads. Typed it in on Google and got 9 ads that took up well over a quarter of the page.
Have been using Bing for months now and have no spam, rarely a dud link (whic also happened with Google) and, well, let's talk about Bing image search vs Google image search...
Also looked for the unncessary data you speak of. All I can find is the picture on the homepage. Are you talking about a jpeg that also teaches you something? (hover your mouse over it...)