Boob Update.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's Bush's fault won't wash this time around. Pathetic old news. Obama can no longer run on that crap. Obama has no record to run on. His billion dollar reelection campaign will be all negative trying to smear his opponent. He smears his own face in doing so. Voters are on to his loser ways. Obama has not 'negotiated' a single 'deal' in regards to anything in the past two and half years. That is amazing. What leadership.

In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan.


Quote:

What’s driving Obama’s unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl details:

•President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
•President Bush began a string of expensive financial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.
•President Bush created a Medicare drug entitlement that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new government health care fund.
•President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. President Obama would double it.
•President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already increased this spending by 20 percent.
•President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.

•President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above. Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has now been added.

 
Update: Second Boob added. Matching pair make Pam Anderson look in need.

Obama's dwindling minions question Botoxi the Clown about eating a 'Satan Sandwich'.

[flash=420,345]http://www.youtube.com/v/m6uMhxFtIh4?version=3&hl=en_US[/flash]

This concludes the Botoxi the Clown Satan Sandwich udate fior today so far.
 
People forget that the whole Iraq mess would not have occurred if Parasite Clinton had done his job. No offense to Russia, China, or any other influential country, but it seems the UN only has balls when it can borrow them from the US; as we know, the resident of the White House when Saddam started reneging on the surrender agreement was too busy using his balls for other things.
 
Clinton was horrific with his foreign policy agenda, example failure in Iraq and the middle east period. Clinton set up 911. Take that failure into consideration and look at Obama. This man has not negotiated a single solitary deal with ANYONE! ANYWHERE! REGARDING ANYTHING! Now that is leadership we can grow on. It will take 20 years to repair the damage the Boob has done to our image and reputation in the world. Boob number one makes Clinton look like a master negotiator Ha. Ha.
 
The Saudis were ready to give us Osama bin Towel's head on a platter, but Clinton's vivisection of the Intelligence Community left no one around who knew what a great idea that would have been. The scariest part, Badge, is how 0bama actually makes Parasite Clinton look acceptable.
 
In the past, a president would actually present a readible real solution
The media would go over it tooth and comb
If it was a repub, the good parts would be discussed quickly, then soon forgotten, and they would swing towards the dems on the philosophical parts the dems could attack
If its a dem president, its all fuzzy, and only the philosophical lib goodies get discussed, over and over
This is the pattern boys, just watch
 
1) There didn't have to be an "Iraq mess". That was a $500B/year war picked up for no reason. Besides, you could easily argue that Bush Sr. should have finished the job. Instead, he pulled out after a 4 day assault that could have easily lead to the ousting of Hussein. If you're gonna go back 15 years to blame a Democrat, remember that you could go back 20 and blame a Republican.

2) Why did we have to start a very difficult war in Iraq? Saddam was no more dangerous than the world's other crazy dictators: Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, Gaddafi, etc.


"In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan."

Please make your points with real math and useful numbers. I could say, "I could have bought 10 classic Duesenbergs with my last paycheck. I make so much money!" But in reality, there's been a lot of inflation since 1920 so that's a bunch of B.S. Yes, debt has gone up a lot with Obama in the office, but considering the income has dropped off so much during a RECESSION, it's tough to say he's increasing it faster that Bush did. If you want to talk about pointless expenses (and yes, Obama has a lot), tell me why we need all these new $10B aircraft carriers--spending started during Bush's presidency. They're worthless in combat because it's not 1944 anymore--missiles and planes can sink boats in any war big enough to use the boats in the first place.

You've got selective vision. You guys can only see Obama and Clinton's mistakes. I can admit Obama's got his flaws--but he's not the great Satan you seem to be making him out to be. I bet your list of Bush's mistakes include:
1) He didn't spend enough time on vacation.
2) His VP was too old to run for President.
 
2) Why did we have to start a very difficult war in Iraq? Saddam was no more dangerous than the world's other crazy dictators: Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, Gaddafi, etc.
Click to expand...

Clinton is responsible for the Iraq war. 911 too. You are 100% more educated about the subject than when you staggered into this discussion. Your logic make no sense.

[flash=420,345]http://www.youtube.com/v/457jp8VGhEE?version=3&hl=en_US[/flash]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom