Bulletproof backup - how to test?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"deko" <deko@deko.com> wrote in message
news:aNyve.23$0V3.14@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>> A double failure from bad ram, bad controller, or bad power supply
>> is not unheard of.
>
> Okay, two more variables: bad controller and/or bad RAM
>
> Even IF both of these variables were to strike, AND my hard drive
> mechanically failed, I would just replace the motherboard (on which the
> SATA
> controller and RAM resides), buy a new system disk (or a new backup disk,
> depending on which one failed), reinstall the OS (if it was the system
> disk
> failed), and restore all my data from the good drive. Only a mechanical
> failure of both drives at the same time could cause data loss.
> Considering
> the MTBF of the drives and the statistical probability of both of them
> failing at the same time, I'd say that's bulletproof.
>
>

You really don't comprehend do you? Bad ram, controller or power supply
could easily corrupt both hard drives before the corruption is noticed. A
corrupt OS is probably the least likely reason why a backup would also
become corrupted. Your method of backing up is good for quick backups. It is
probably the least bulletproof of any backup method. Most knowledgable users
use a similar method for quick backups and another method less often for
redundancy.

Kerry
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

> Bad ram, controller or power supply
> could easily corrupt both hard drives before the corruption is noticed.

So data corruption (as opposed to OS corruption) can be caused by faulty
hardware and render useless ANY connected drive? That's a good reason to
maintain a copy of my data on disconnected media.
 

Rock

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2002
1,242
0
19,280
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

deko wrote:

>>Bad ram, controller or power supply
>>could easily corrupt both hard drives before the corruption is noticed.
>
>
> So data corruption (as opposed to OS corruption) can be caused by faulty
> hardware and render useless ANY connected drive? That's a good reason to
> maintain a copy of my data on disconnected media.
>
>

The light finally goes on.

--
Rock
MS MVP Windows - Shell/User
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"Rock" <rock@mail.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ec%23fCwneFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> deko wrote:
>
> >>Bad ram, controller or power supply
> >>could easily corrupt both hard drives before the corruption is noticed.
> >
> >
> > So data corruption (as opposed to OS corruption) can be caused by faulty
> > hardware and render useless ANY connected drive? That's a good reason
to
> > maintain a copy of my data on disconnected media.
> >
> >
>
> The light finally goes on.
>
> --
> Rock
> MS MVP Windows - Shell/User
>

I suspect it is a fairly dim bulb though ... sort of like
a Christmas tree light maybe ...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Just don't raise them close to deserted areas, some people might steal them
to ride on

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Jayso

Please reply to this email so I know if i'm right :)

Good in Home Networking, XP Home based problems, and Pro based Problems
Add my email to MSN Messenger if u wish
jayso_chinnery@spamfreehotmail.com.au (remove spamfree)


"Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
news:%2390pAhbeFHA.2076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Nope, granite releases Radon gas which is radioactive.
> Better have a place on top of a mountain plain and the
> second place in hyperspace.
>
> And there are a billion Muslims who might attack your pig
> farm, better to raise camels.
>
>
> "deko" <deko@deko.com> wrote in message
> news:hahve.33929$J12.19475@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> |> No, to be truely safe, you must abandon the
> computer-related business and
> | > open a pig farm.
> |
> | But what if a meteoroid were to hit the farm???? To be
> truly safe, I'd need
> | TWO farms - on different continents in granite mines.
> |
> |
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

You are so lucky, i wish i had the need for bullet-proof backup systems. My
work has a backup system (like most should), but i probably won't be allowed
to destroy the Windows Server 2003 O/S.

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Jayso

Please reply to this email so I know if i'm right :)

Good in Home Networking, XP Home based problems, and Pro based Problems
Add my email to MSN Messenger if u wish
jayso_chinnery@spamfreehotmail.com.au (remove spamfree)


"deko" <deko@deko.com> wrote in message
news:Rirve.2274$N22.470@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>> If the corrupted OS was caused by bad ram or a bad hard drive controller
>> then the same thing could cause corrupted files on both drives. So no the
> OS
>> itself wouldn't corrupt the second drive but it is possible that the same
>> problem could happen on both drives.
>
> Yes, but that would be a "double failure" - something that's not very
> likely. With a removable HDD tray for the second drive, I can swap
> multiple
> drives in and out (and store off site if I want), which would make things
> even more bulletproof.
>
> In any case, I am still having fun corrupting my OS to see what happens...
>
>