[citation][nom]robwright[/nom]I have a strange feeling that if it was EA that introduced a paid service like this for B3, there'd be a much different public reaction from gamers. I'd bet I'd be reading comments like "BF3 FTW!!!" with people arguing that EA, unlike Activision, is actually innovating with its shooter franchise.In any case, I wonder if people reacted with this much hatred when publishers first introduced paid subscriptions with MMOs, or if this negative reaction is focused mostly on Activision and its CEO.[/citation]
people wouldnt pay for that and would disown ea altogether, because it seams they are ruining studios like bioware. mass effect 3 got delayed because ea wants it to be ever more main stream...
i pay for an mmo because the massive amount of servers, and community that come with it... any fps worth playing can go on forever because the players who like the game will buy their own damn servers
[citation][nom]hot74rod2003[/nom]if they dont get rid of the tomahawk and silly speed running around with a knife perks im not even buying it. they need to make this game more real life. i bet %98 percent of people in the world could get a tomahawk to stick in a tree from 10 ft away ,,, oh yeah and you can take 50 bullets from a gun and live but get hit in the big toe by a tomahawk and die instantly???????? plus in real life you would never run around with a knife cause you would be dead in no time flat. they should use the damage model from , operation flashpoint[/citation]
i hate to say this because i sound like i'm defending mw, but you really don't understand what a game is and what it means right?
its sad however that realistic tactical fps games died as a genre.