Doom and Gloom, 1 planned multithreaded app won't come out and QFX won't run any games at 60fps.
BooHoo, poor AMD buyer.
BooHoo.
You got one thing right, anyone buying QuadFX will be crying when they see the power bill! :lol:
Doom and Gloom, 1 planned multithreaded app won't come out and QFX won't run any games at 60fps.
BooHoo, poor AMD buyer.
BooHoo.
When Porsche releases a new engine it isn't to be faster than Ferrari's new engine, it's to be faster than Porsche's old engine.
WHY THE (BLEEP) WOULD SOMEONE WANT TO RUN FOUR INSTANCES OF THE SAME GAME? WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO RUN ANYTHING MORE THAN ONE INSTANCE OF A GAME?Baron's my forumz buddy and all, but I must say, if you buy QuadFX you will regret it.
Quad FX is inferior in just about every single way. Quad FX is one of the most overwhelming failures I have ever seen.
I know you'll never buy an Intel machine, but do your wallet a favor and hold off on AMD quad until they actually make a quad core processor.
Over on the site which I cannot and will not name I will quote the following that made me wee myself:
An Intel system doesn't have enough bandwidth to handle DDR2 800. The 4x4 can allow 4 gamers play 4 different games at the same time without a glitch.
I don't even know what the hell that means. Wouldn't Google run their servers on...um... SERVERS? And haven't we had huge multi-processor servers for years?I expect Quad FX to become a cheaper server alternative. 12 SATA drives, 8TB, cheap ram, one such beast can handle 8000 Google mail users or more. With 100,000 such machines, you can kill Google.
Who the hell runs the same thing four times over? There's very few instances where one would do that. Basically, Shakira is trying to CREATE ARTIFICIAL BENCHMARKS that somehow put Quad FX on top of Core 2 Quad.But true multitasking benchmarks would show Quad FX fragging anything Intel has in stock. As I said long time ago, the right way to measure multitasking performance is to launch multiple instances of the same program and measure the completion time. In this case, one should launch four copies of the same program at the same time.
What's sad is that you can't imagine a professional uses multithreaded apps.
I mean REALLY SAD!!
Go away!
Also are you sure that you really want to buy and use a system that will double the amount of electricity needed? I thouht that you and Al Gore were tight and shared some common interests in prediction and invention.
MPD...Multiple Personality Disorder....AKA...CYBIL. 😛 He/She has 4 personalities.Jesus, I've seen smarter people clean streets. What you're saying has no logic...I make no sense alot of the time, but you're just being a retard. Quit talking about stuff you know nothing about, stop posting quotes that you can't provide links to and finally stop wasting people's time. Keep w**king to your dead animal p0rn and leave this forum.
Your benchmark results mean nothing and your lack of knowledge suggests that you have some kind of learning difficulty...Tell me - was you mother your dad's sister? Probably...That would explain much...Whya would run 4 games at once? You can't play them all? Justify why you would even think about running 4 games at once.
I don't like intel, but I can admit when they have something going...And this gravy train will be a long time stopping (the gravy train is Intel...Just incase you thought gravy came on trains baronBS)
When Porsche releases a new engine it isn't to be faster than Ferrari's new engine, it's to be faster than Porsche's old engine.
There are people visiting this forum, otuside from "your" country.No can do. This is a free country. Stay out of my threads. I can talk to myself for 8 pages.
When Porsche releases a new engine it isn't to be faster than Ferrari's new engine, it's to be faster than Porsche's old engine.
Baron:
Didn't you make a prediction that the two chip system would use about the same amount of current as a single cpu system and get over twice the results? Thats a real shame becuse we all know that all of your other predictions are now fact.
Also are you sure that you really want to buy and use a system that will double the amount of electricity needed? I thouht that you and Al Gore were tight and shared some common interests in prediction and invention.
If a few hundred of these systems are unleashed it will probably step up the global warming situation and rip a hole in the ozone layer.
Baron:
Didn't you make a prediction that the two chip system would use about the same amount of current as a single cpu system and get over twice the results? Thats a real shame becuse we all know that all of your other predictions are now fact.
Also are you sure that you really want to buy and use a system that will double the amount of electricity needed? I thouht that you and Al Gore were tight and shared some common interests in prediction and invention.
If a few hundred of these systems are unleashed it will probably step up the global warming situation and rip a hole in the ozone layer.
Step 1: Ignore all idiots, weaklings, illogical explanations and arguments.
Step 2: Imagine that your hardware ets the job done.
Step 3: Accept your reality as wishes and apply them to non-CPU engineers.
When Porsche releases a new engine it isn't to be faster than Ferrari's new engine, it's to be faster than Porsche's old engine.
:lol: - I thought this URL was appropriate: http://cars.uk.msn.com/greenmotoring/article.aspx?cp-documentid=1388484
8) - Tabris😀arkPeace
:lol:Sales of 4x4s slump
Step 2: Imagine that your hardware gets the job done.
Not if you enable BaronBS nLogic®but the next year or so is going to be an Intel year until AMD can counter with something good (4x4 is not that something).
http://www.velocitymicro.com/wizard.php?iid=32
Baron, here is your Quad Father, go for it man, post some verified benchmarks.
wes
$3895
No Monitor