can I play battlefield 4

[Jcor50]

3.6 GHz FX-series Quad core FX 4100 processer
8 Gb of ram
1024 gb hardrive
EVGA GeForce GTX 760 2GB graphics card
seasonic bronze 520 W eps psu
I want to know if I can play on high settings or any other settings
thank you

 

[PureGarrison]

Your bottleneck is the 4100 processor. You should still be able to run it well though
high settings: ~40 fps

You could run it on ultra if you upgrade to the 6000 series when you get the chance. It is a bit better for a processor-heavy game like Battlefield

 

[Jcor50]

Your bottleneck is the 4100 processor. You should still be able to run it well though
high settings: ~40 fps

You could run it on ultra if you upgrade to the 6000 series when you get the chance. It is a bit better for a processor-heavy game like Battlefield

so I will still be able to run the game on high settings no sweat? I am planning on switching my processor in October

 

[PureGarrison]

Yeah you should have no problem. Probably about 40-50 fps

 

[DolanDuk]

Go for the FX 8320 if you can. There are still some bottlenecks on the 6000 series. I know from experience.

On most maps though you should get above 40fps on high-ultra

 

[Jcor50]

Go for the FX 8320 if you can. There are still some bottlenecks on the 6000 series. I know from experience.

On most maps though you should get above 40fps on high-ultra

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113286

how would this be. the one you linked was too expensive. even buying this one is pushing it. by the way is 40 fps even playable? is it laggy?

 

[DolanDuk]

I have a FX 6300 and a GTX 750 Ti and I get 60 fps most of the time on a mix of mid-ultra settings so if you got a FX 6300 you would do pretty darn well. Although I do get some weird frame drops on certain maps, (like 2 maps out of 20 and only on particular servers) I think this could just be a game problem though and will be patched soonish.

If you scavenge around you could get the 6300 for 100 bucks.

 

[Jcor50]

I have a FX 6300 and a GTX 750 Ti and I get 60 fps most of the time on a mix of mid-ultra settings so if you got a FX 6300 you would do pretty darn well. Although I do get some weird frame drops on certain maps, (like 2 maps out of 20 and only on particular servers) I think this could just be a game problem though and will be patched soonish.

If you scavenge around you could get the 6300 for 100 bucks.

thanks for the help that is what I plan on getting. I am ordering the graphics card, psu, and cpu as soon as possible

 

[DolanDuk]

I have a FX 6300 and a GTX 750 Ti and I get 60 fps most of the time on a mix of mid-ultra settings so if you got a FX 6300 you would do pretty darn well. Although I do get some weird frame drops on certain maps, (like 2 maps out of 20 and only on particular servers) I think this could just be a game problem though and will be patched soonish.

If you scavenge around you could get the 6300 for 100 bucks.

thanks for the help that is what I plan on getting. I am ordering the graphics card, psu, and cpu as soon as possible

Awesome! I hope to see you out on the battlefield.

 

[PureGarrison]

If you're still wondering 40 fps is definitely playable. Above 30 frames, your eyes really cant distinguish a difference.

All console games run 30 fps (or maybe a little more (31,32)), so above that is great