The only real downsize of his build is the power consumption. The performance difference of the CPU will be very good. R9 280 and GTX 960 have similar performance, but I like the GTX 960 better. Both are good cards.The vram difference is almost irrelevant, maybe in the future it will be more relevant, not sure.
Power consumption is higher, but the PSU more than covers it. As for VRAM, I went with the 3GB because even now games want more. GTAV is a good example, where the 2GB of my GTX 750ti is the biggest limiting factor.
This has a core i5 instead of a i3 or a AMD CPU, but it sacrifices a SSD to do so, which in my opinion is well worth the trade-off. I also changed the GTX 960 to a R9 280, as more and more games are demanding high VRAM.
This has a core i5 instead of a i3 or a AMD CPU, but it sacrifices a SSD to do so, which in my opinion is well worth the trade-off. I also changed the GTX 960 to a R9 280, as more and more games are demanding high VRAM.
be careful with the price of the build suggested by Arch, because it includes promotions that already ended and mail in rebates, the real price will be around 662$
The only real downsize of his build is the power consumption. The performance difference of the CPU will be very good. R9 280 and GTX 960 have similar performance, but I like the GTX 960 better. Both are good cards.The vram difference is almost irrelevant, maybe in the future it will be more relevant, not sure.
The only real downsize of his build is the power consumption. The performance difference of the CPU will be very good. R9 280 and GTX 960 have similar performance, but I like the GTX 960 better. Both are good cards.The vram difference is almost irrelevant, maybe in the future it will be more relevant, not sure.
Power consumption is higher, but the PSU more than covers it. As for VRAM, I went with the 3GB because even now games want more. GTAV is a good example, where the 2GB of my GTX 750ti is the biggest limiting factor.