Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (
More info?)
It is indeed a fact that the i860/i865 has been replaced by the ip4000. I
have the ip4000 and before that I used the i860 for about a year...the
ip4000 is definately the better printer. The dual paper feed, auto-duplex,
slightly better speed and marginally better photo quality make this an
upgrade I feel good about.
Cheers,
Jeff H
"Emrys Davies" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2vuvloF2o6uktU1@uni-berlin.de...
> I am definitely not into the technicalities of printers, but I was of
> the impression from what I have read that the Canon i865 is far superior
> to the iP4000 and I was hoping to solicit a general view as to the
> merits of my belief.
>
> Is it a fact that the Cannon i865 is being discontinued and that the iP
> 4000 has taken its place.
>
> Sorry I didn't explain myself very well.
>
> Thanks,
> Emrys Davies.
>
>
>
>
> "colinco" <colincomma@yawhoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c03ffaebacc1135989872@news.xtra.co.nz...
> In article Emrys Davies says...
> > Last week I was viewing the Canon iP 4000 (£129.99) in PC World when
> one
> > of their advisors told me that it was the replacement for the Canon
> > i865.
> >
> > That does not make sense to me. Some views would be appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Emrys Davies.
> >
> >
> >
> What doesn't make sense about it
> i865 text BK + 4 colour => iP4000 text BK + 4 colour.
> i560 text BK + 3 colour => iP3000 text BK + 3 colour.
> i900D/905D => iP6000D
> The main difference with the Pixma package is the paper handling, trays
> etc.
>
>