[citation][nom]drutort[/nom]this is disappointing, i mean great a game loads faster, but what about all the daily issues with the 2d stuff, that everyone experiences... all they care about is how fast a game loads? that takes a month to fix? looks like someone was on vacation...[/citation]Didn't that driver issue only affect the 5000 series, and also what application are you suffering from severe 2D performance problems? I haven't had any issues with my 4850 for what it's worth, 3D or 2D.
[citation][nom]hardwaretechy[/nom]
maybe you should do more research. read toms graphics-card hierarchy chart and you'll notice that the 4890 is only one tier above the 9800 GTX+. the difference in FPS you would see would be small or difficult to notice w/o benchmarks.
This is not accurate, the 4890 performs better than the GTX 260 in most cases and in a few limited cases on par with the GTX 285. So 9800 GTX+? The performance level should be fairly higher, certainly noticeable.To the guy with the issue, check the settings within CCC, by default it might have the AA filter or level too high for instance, or vsync is forced on (in which case you could be topping out if you are measuring via 'fps', etc).[/citation]I'd say that in a lot of titles, a 4890 is not a huge boost over a 9800GTX+ (the GTX+ is identical to a GTS 250). It wouldn't make sense to upgrade to a 4890 unless the games you played were favored by the 4800 cards. It would make a lot more sense to upgrade to a 5850, a 275, something higher end. Otherwise, you could just wait and save your cash, there's nothing wrong with a 9800GTX+ unless the rest of your machine is badass.
Speaking of which, who is to say the rest of his system isn't part of the issue?