China's Tsinghua Threatens To Disrupt Semiconductor Industry, Building $30 Billion DRAM And NAND Fab

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

sam1275tom

Reputable
Oct 13, 2014
462
0
4,860


I just want to clear one thing here, by saying "China" I mean mainland only, that didn't included Taiwan, Taiwan's product are good.
 

epdm2be

Distinguished
Feb 15, 2011
150
1
18,680
"It's funny how there always seem to happen a "shortage" of materials when the product's price is going down...Always...Memory, HDD and now SSD...Isnt it funny!?"

Some call this "free markets" but it's actually a greed driven economy.

The really ironic thing is that nowadays all consumer product manufacturing is in the hands of the largest communist state in the world and commissioned by companies that are supposed to despise communism.
 

lsatenstein

Distinguished
Mar 8, 2012
77
0
18,630
The two great powers in the world are the USA and China. The USA controls the chip manufacturing through its ownership or partnership with all chip factories.
If ever China and the USA (with Trump or after) have a disagreement eg. economic war, China wants to be fully independent of the USA's control of the market.

China also has 4 times the population of the USA, and with the IOT (Internet of Things), their own internal demand would or could be met by the factory they are building.

That factory will also allow them to produce an alternative to the Intel/AMD family of cpu chips.
 


There's a ton of China's population (well, the percentage isn't all that big in many ways considering the size of population) that live in rural communities,, as they have for centuries. While modern conveniences have hit their radar, they have not the means to use or obtain them.
 

Jesse_78

Commendable
Jan 31, 2017
2
0
1,510
Intel has five or more new generations of tech already on it's shelves, waiting for timed roll-outs over the next ten years. Not only is this unconscionable greed, but it stymies fair competition and further tech advancement by other companies. They have CPU's some six generations ahead of their current offerings just sitting there.
 

Jesse_78

Commendable
Jan 31, 2017
2
0
1,510
Intel has five or more new generations of tech already on it's shelves, waiting for timed roll-outs over the next ten years. Not only is this unconscionable greed, but it stymies fair competition and further tech advancement. They have CPU's some six generations ahead of their current offerings just sitting there.
 

bit_user

Polypheme
Ambassador
This is an interesting claim. Can you cite a source, please?

The reason I'm skeptical is that they can't really design a chip without detailed knowledge of the process. And accounts are that they've hit problems with the 10 nm process, which is why they added the Coffee Lake generation as another 14 nm.

http://semiaccurate.com/2016/12/28/coffee-lake-says-dire-things-intels-10nm-problems/

And with that many problems at 10 nm, it seems unlikely they're any further along with 7 nm. Plus, as that article points out, they haven't even finished the roll out of their Purley platform, which was originally slated for 2015. All of this suggests that instead of being so far ahead of the game, they're actually continuing to fall behind.
 

bit_user

Polypheme
Ambassador
I understand and agree with the policy, but tech doesn't happen in a vacuum. Tech is sometimes intrinsically interesting, but it's also sometimes interesting to see how it's used as a tool or a stage for strategic moves by big players (be they companies or countries).

As this is one such case, we can't discuss this while completely avoiding any mention of economics or political systems. So, I hope we can look to your gentle guidance on where the appropriate boundaries lie.

Thank you for your service to this community.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.