Churn Calculation

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In case anyone out there wants to try to say that the monthly CHURN
numbers reported quarterly are quarterly numbers, let me show you the
numbers.

2.9% MONTHLY CHURN * 3 = 8.7% Quarterly CHURN

8.7% * 16 million average Customers = 1.3 Million lost customers


Imagine how good SprintPCS' financials could be if the Churn was
at 2% like Verizon.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-6A14D4.12431620042004@news02.east.earthlink.net...
> In case anyone out there wants to try to say that the monthly CHURN
> numbers reported quarterly are quarterly numbers, let me show you the
> numbers.
>
> 2.9% MONTHLY CHURN * 3 = 8.7% Quarterly CHURN
>
> 8.7% * 16 million average Customers = 1.3 Million lost customers
>
>
> Imagine how good SprintPCS' financials could be if the Churn was
> at 2% like Verizon.

So, let us get this straight. You continue to despise SPCS, putting out all
these arguments, and continue to praise Verizon. Is that about right? Then
WTF are you still with SPCS Phillipe? Are you a masochist, or just an idiot?
You must be, if you continue service with a company you continue to knock.

Bob

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Bob Smith" <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:Ipdhc.2239$eZ5.1348@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:rmarkoff-6A14D4.12431620042004@news02.east.earthlink.net...
> > In case anyone out there wants to try to say that the monthly CHURN
> > numbers reported quarterly are quarterly numbers, let me show you the
> > numbers.
> >
> > 2.9% MONTHLY CHURN * 3 = 8.7% Quarterly CHURN
> >
> > 8.7% * 16 million average Customers = 1.3 Million lost customers
> >
> >
> > Imagine how good SprintPCS' financials could be if the Churn was
> > at 2% like Verizon.
>
> So, let us get this straight. You continue to despise SPCS, putting out all
> these arguments, and continue to praise Verizon. Is that about right? Then
> WTF are you still with SPCS Phillipe? Are you a masochist, or just an idiot?
> You must be, if you continue service with a company you continue to knock.
>
> Bob
>

The troll also is deficient in mathematics.
Could he really be that oblivious to compound calculations?
Or maybe he's just trolling us on that point, too.
Sad.
---JRC---

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"John R. Copeland" <jcopelan@columbus.rr.aol.com> wrote in message
news:6kehc.33734$GN6.7570@fe2.columbus.rr.com...

"Bob Smith" <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Ipdhc.2239$eZ5.1348@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:rmarkoff-6A14D4.12431620042004@news02.east.earthlink.net...
> > In case anyone out there wants to try to say that the monthly CHURN
> > numbers reported quarterly are quarterly numbers, let me show you the
> > numbers.
> >
> > 2.9% MONTHLY CHURN * 3 = 8.7% Quarterly CHURN
> >
> > 8.7% * 16 million average Customers = 1.3 Million lost customers
> >
> >
> > Imagine how good SprintPCS' financials could be if the Churn was
> > at 2% like Verizon.
>
> So, let us get this straight. You continue to despise SPCS, putting out
all
> these arguments, and continue to praise Verizon. Is that about right? Then
> WTF are you still with SPCS Phillipe? Are you a masochist, or just an
idiot?
> You must be, if you continue service with a company you continue to knock.
>
> Bob
>

The troll also is deficient in mathematics.
Could he really be that oblivious to compound calculations?
Or maybe he's just trolling us on that point, too.
Sad.

That's it exactly John ... What I don't understand, is why he thinks he has
any credibility here, when he changes his IDs 65 times? I've grown tired of
his tirades as they are all old, bogus, lies, and just BS. I've got 65 names
in my kill filters on him to mark his comments as read.

I'm only going to reply to those posts where I recognize an ID change.

Bob

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

>The troll also is deficient in mathematics.
>Could he really be that oblivious to compound calculations?
>Or maybe he's just trolling us on that point, too.
>Sad.
>---JRC---

If no one ever responded to any of his messages, maybe, just maybe, he would go
away.

--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"John S." <sexyexotiche@aol.comspamfree> wrote in message news:20040420210620.10191.00000041@mb-m14.aol.com...
> >The troll also is deficient in mathematics.
> >Could he really be that oblivious to compound calculations?
> >Or maybe he's just trolling us on that point, too.
> >Sad.
> >---JRC---
>
> If no one ever responded to any of his messages, maybe, just maybe, he would go
> away.
> --
> John S.
>
That's been tried, briefly, on the fool.
It didn't work.
He gets increasingly ludicrous until he finds someone's boiling point.
Most parents of a two-year-old can recognize that behavior.
But I agree that IF we could ignore it long enough, he'd disappear.
---JRC---

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

>But I agree that IF we could ignore it long enough, he'd disappear.

Well, I have been pplaying with the filter's of this news reader and find that
I can filter the Author ( "Robert M." rmarkoff@msn.com), now if I could just
filter the body.........

--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> >The troll also is deficient in mathematics.
> >Could he really be that oblivious to compound calculations?
> >Or maybe he's just trolling us on that point, too.
> >Sad.
> >---JRC---

If you disbelieve SprintPCS own numbers, come up with your own.

Quoted Directly from their SEC report is not Trolling.
Denying these numbers is a TROLL.

Churn is 8.7% per quarter, 2.9 % per month, or
an annual rate of 34.8%. Thats 5 Million plus
customers that vote with their feet
from the

Worst Customer Service

Dishonest coverage maps

Secret policies on warranties and retention

Or maybe 5 million people need to be filtered by
the SprintPCS apologists.