Quote:
one of my old modems had a usb connection as an option for computers, granted this was when ethernet wasnt integrated into motherboards yet. now if my math is right, 2gbit would be closer ro 200mb up and down... if they would add a small layer of lag to it, it could be done through usb3 rather than a 10gbit port.
YES - it could be done with USB 3.0 (5Gb/s or 625MB/s if you like), or USB 3.1 (10Gb/s or 1.25GB/s if you like). Good point. Deduct some 20% for overhead, but still it could be done. USB 3.1 has only ~3% overhead. Much better.
I also thought that it may more likely just ship with Gig Ethernet ports, and multiple users on, say 5 or so ports might 'share' a possible overall available 2G/bs of access. But I merely speculate.
one of my old modems had a usb connection as an option for computers, granted this was when ethernet wasnt integrated into motherboards yet. now if my math is right, 2gbit would be closer ro 200mb up and down... if they would add a small layer of lag to it, it could be done through usb3 rather than a 10gbit port.
YES - it could be done with USB 3.0 (5Gb/s or 625MB/s if you like), or USB 3.1 (10Gb/s or 1.25GB/s if you like). Good point. Deduct some 20% for overhead, but still it could be done. USB 3.1 has only ~3% overhead. Much better.
I also thought that it may more likely just ship with Gig Ethernet ports, and multiple users on, say 5 or so ports might 'share' a possible overall available 2G/bs of access. But I merely speculate.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram