I was looking at CPUs for gaming which would be good, but not the best...money is important. Along those lines I see a Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores and 3.4GHz base clock. I also see a Ryzen 7 1700 with 8 cores and a slightly lower base core clock of 3.0Ghz (and only slightly more expensive). 8 cores would not necessarily make this faster with games not using 8 cores, but it would add some length to its usable life and perhaps help with recording or streaming of games.
Obviously individual core clocks matter for gaming, but I'm wondering if the Ryzen 7 architecture might make up at least partially versus the Ryzen 5 and thus make core clocks a bad comparison of actual performance. Can anyone suggest how much worse this Ryzen 7 would be in comparison to the faster Ryzen 5 if both are used in the same game which only uses 6 cores? 3.0GHz is quite a bit slower than 3.4GHz if both cores are the same, but I don't know if the cores perform differently at a given base clock.
Obviously individual core clocks matter for gaming, but I'm wondering if the Ryzen 7 architecture might make up at least partially versus the Ryzen 5 and thus make core clocks a bad comparison of actual performance. Can anyone suggest how much worse this Ryzen 7 would be in comparison to the faster Ryzen 5 if both are used in the same game which only uses 6 cores? 3.0GHz is quite a bit slower than 3.4GHz if both cores are the same, but I don't know if the cores perform differently at a given base clock.