I read in a different thread that hwmonitor is the general consensus "best" sensor for cpu temps. I have no idea why that is, but I can say I'd never used it. Up til now I'd used only "coretemp" for monitoring temps. My testing with LinX (longest prior to last night was 2.5hrs) resulted in max temps on coretemp showing 72, 68, 69, 72. Last night I set up hwmonitor, and let LinX run overnight, over 8 hours. As shown on the image attached, hwmonitor displays temps cooler by a few degrees. Not that this is earth shattering, but I like these number better. Does anyone understand why there is a difference, and is there a reason to trust hwmonitor over coretemp?
