Virgin to the NAS setup game - can I get some help with these questions?
First, when I want the NAS to see backup data from different OS-based machines (mac and windows), is partitioning the NAS required?
-Is is required if I am storing system images (containing OS files)?
-Is it not required if I am just storing non-system critical software files, pictures, music, etc?
Second, can you expand on what NAS-based "shares" granted to the different OS-based machines means, if that is the answer to why partitioning isn't necessary? I'm trying to rule in that a true marketed NAS (i.e., Synology) has the capacity to manage each machine's access by folders and size restrictions within them so partitioning isn't necessary.
Third, I am also thinking about this via just a generic consumer level HDD USB drive becoming NAS; with that, would setting it partitions initially, by mounting it to each OS machine be necessary? This is a cheaper route to take in my mind.
Lastly, when a NAS drive is partitioned, would all the partitions automatically mount to each machine? Is there a need to limit that; is there a way to restrict the correct partitions to access the correct machines? Is the alternative having a NAS that shares folder structures instead of partitioning itself?
If later on, I want to create media sharing (music, movies, and pictures) probably through ITunes, Garage band, IMovie, IPhoto, should I be better off when one configuration over the other if both are possible?
This will all help me decide if I should go with a Synology product or just slap in a USB HDD!
Thanks for the chance to learn-
First, when I want the NAS to see backup data from different OS-based machines (mac and windows), is partitioning the NAS required?
-Is is required if I am storing system images (containing OS files)?
-Is it not required if I am just storing non-system critical software files, pictures, music, etc?
Second, can you expand on what NAS-based "shares" granted to the different OS-based machines means, if that is the answer to why partitioning isn't necessary? I'm trying to rule in that a true marketed NAS (i.e., Synology) has the capacity to manage each machine's access by folders and size restrictions within them so partitioning isn't necessary.
Third, I am also thinking about this via just a generic consumer level HDD USB drive becoming NAS; with that, would setting it partitions initially, by mounting it to each OS machine be necessary? This is a cheaper route to take in my mind.
Lastly, when a NAS drive is partitioned, would all the partitions automatically mount to each machine? Is there a need to limit that; is there a way to restrict the correct partitions to access the correct machines? Is the alternative having a NAS that shares folder structures instead of partitioning itself?
If later on, I want to create media sharing (music, movies, and pictures) probably through ITunes, Garage band, IMovie, IPhoto, should I be better off when one configuration over the other if both are possible?
This will all help me decide if I should go with a Synology product or just slap in a USB HDD!
Thanks for the chance to learn-