News Cooler Master sues competitors for infringing on patented pump-inside-radiator cooler design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Placement of a pump in a loop should NOT be allowed to be patented. It restricts options & effectively makes a monopoly in that sector.

in AIO theres literally only 3 options: the pump in rad, the hose, or coldplate.

we alreayd have patens on both ends now only missing 1 is hose...and thats not exactly a good idea as pumps are weight and sag a hose that has no ability to hold itself up in a system.
 
Didn't MSI's MAG CoreLiquid series get a recall for faulty pumps or something? I'm guesing CM saw that and didn't want people to think their design was faulty if MSI stole it. Or maybe their design deviates just enough from CM's that it wouldn't be worth it.
 
Placement of a pump in a loop should NOT be allowed to be patented. It restricts options & effectively makes a monopoly in that sector.
I hope this gets to court, and that the patent gets invalidated there for not being inventive enough.

Unfortunately, a granted US patent can't get invalidated without going to court.
 
Last edited:
So they can't put the pump in the cooler, they can't put it in the rad, did someone patent "pump in hose" yet?
If you could somehow make a standard thickness soft hose that also functions as a pump, you might actually have something worthy of a patent.

Unlike these two.

Also, the Swiftech H240 preceded Cooler Master's patent by 5 years. That was a discrete pump mounted on the radiator rather than an integral pump embedded in the radiator, but "What if we did that layout and built the pump into it better?" doesn't seem particularly novel.
 
The US patent system is a farce. It should be abolished.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.