For the last few years, Intel had no competition, so it seems like the performances on their processors didn't increase much. They just want to milk as much money they can (by giving newer generations small performance increase) until competition comes back. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Going from 7,599 to 7,987 doesn't seem so significant.
Let's take a look at i5-3570k. Passmark score is 7,130
i5-4670k: 7,599
i5-6600k: 7,987
i7-980X: 8,948
When there was competition with AMD.
i7-920: 4981
i5-655k: 3,325
i5-2500k:6,446
Going from 3,325 to 6,446 seems significant. 7,130 to 7,599 didn't seem significant. What was better was that the i5 from the 2nd generation was better than the 1st generation of i7. (Sorry if this sounds stupid. I know companies can name their products whatever they want.)
Does this mean the newer CPUs released by Intel will have more significant performance progressions, due to the competition with AMD?
Going from 7,599 to 7,987 doesn't seem so significant.
Let's take a look at i5-3570k. Passmark score is 7,130
i5-4670k: 7,599
i5-6600k: 7,987
i7-980X: 8,948
When there was competition with AMD.
i7-920: 4981
i5-655k: 3,325
i5-2500k:6,446
Going from 3,325 to 6,446 seems significant. 7,130 to 7,599 didn't seem significant. What was better was that the i5 from the 2nd generation was better than the 1st generation of i7. (Sorry if this sounds stupid. I know companies can name their products whatever they want.)
Does this mean the newer CPUs released by Intel will have more significant performance progressions, due to the competition with AMD?