[citation][nom]computerfarmer[/nom]Why DDR4 instead of DDR5. DDR5 has been produced for years for video cards. Video cards were first to use DDR3 then computer systems followed in their footsteps. If video card companies saw no used for DDR4 then why is it being looked at it at all. I am confused a the thought process here.[/citation]
i'm with this guy, why the thumbs down? he is dead on right why bother with RIM rambus just like why bother with DDR4 when DDR5 is already here and a finished product on video cards for the last year.
look how long DDR2 lasted, you will be stuck in the same boat with DDR4 because the switch to DDR5 will be a year after.
do you guys really believe DDR4 is going to keep up with quad, septa, octa cpu's, PCIE 3.0 and usb 3.0 at the same time?
i sure don't, but that's due to past experience.
DDR4 is not even out of development and it's already fossilized dinosaur poo.
this is like win 8 just starting to implement touch interface when voice command has been out for almost a decade before siri arrived.
you shouldn't be playing catch up, you should skip over it for the next great thing.
anything less is just milking the consumers for nickle and dimes and is liable to ruin your reputation for being a leader instead of the follower you really are.