G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)
Will be using Windows XP Home SP2.
Just purchased a Dimension 4700 from Dell Outlet; I got 512MB of DDR2-400
RAM(2x256).
I bought an upgrade from Crucial: 2x512MB of DDR2-533 (PC2-4200 . CL=4 .
UNBUFFERED . NON-ECC)
From searching these posts,it seems that the 4700 will run DDR2-533 at the
full speed; is this correct?
Am I better off running ONLY 1 PAIR of the new 2x512MB of DDR2-533 for a 1GB
total RAM;
or should I run BOTH PAIRS (2x512MB of DDR2-533 and 2x256 of DDR2-400) for a
total of 1.5GB RAM running at the slower DDR2-400 speed?
Which configuration would give better overall performance?
I do a lot of Photoshop work, and some light video encoding.
begin 666 p.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``/___P```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$`0 ("1 $`.P``
`
end
Will be using Windows XP Home SP2.
Just purchased a Dimension 4700 from Dell Outlet; I got 512MB of DDR2-400
RAM(2x256).
I bought an upgrade from Crucial: 2x512MB of DDR2-533 (PC2-4200 . CL=4 .
UNBUFFERED . NON-ECC)
From searching these posts,it seems that the 4700 will run DDR2-533 at the
full speed; is this correct?
Am I better off running ONLY 1 PAIR of the new 2x512MB of DDR2-533 for a 1GB
total RAM;
or should I run BOTH PAIRS (2x512MB of DDR2-533 and 2x256 of DDR2-400) for a
total of 1.5GB RAM running at the slower DDR2-400 speed?
Which configuration would give better overall performance?
I do a lot of Photoshop work, and some light video encoding.
begin 666 p.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``/___P```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$`0 ("1 $`.P``
`
end