Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table (Archive)

[King_V]

If you have lost the 1030 have a look in the GTX 465 box .. there is a link to Amazon with no description text and that links to the 1030 on Amazon so I assume they just forgot to write GT1030 .. its on par with RX550

Weird...

 

[King_V]

Also, given the addition of the Vega in the chart, would the top tier be best broken up into two tiers?

The Titan Xp, Titan X (Pascal), and 1080Ti in the top tier, and the 1080 and Vega 64 in the second tier - with the rest of the table the same, other than the former 2nd tier now being the 3rd tier, etc.

Thoughts?

 

[carssuckjeepsrule]

Lol...still no GT 1030. oops!

 

[King_V]

Lol...still no GT 1030. oops!

It's there, it's just "semi-invisible" at the moment.

If you look on the Nvidia side of the tier where the RX550 exists, there's a link for price, but with no video card name next to it. It's immediately above the GTX 465. As of the time I'm writing this, the link says "($69.99 On Amazon)" which takes you to a Zotac GT 1030 on Amazon.

Thanks to Goranz for pointing this out. I know I missed it!

 

[carssuckjeepsrule]

Lol...still no GT 1030. oops!

It's there, it's just "semi-invisible" at the moment.

If you look on the Nvidia side of the tier where the RX550 exists, there's a link for price, but with no video card name next to it. It's immediately above the GTX 465. As of the time I'm writing this, the link says "($69.99 On Amazon)" which takes you to a Zotac GT 1030 on Amazon.

Thanks to Goranz for pointing this out. I know I missed it!

 

[carssuckjeepsrule]

Tally ho! Got it!

 

[cdelbeek]

It is on the chart, but only a link to its Amazon page, they seem to have forgotten to add GT 1030 before it. You can find the link right above the GTX 465.

 

[landonhofmeister]

The Gtx 1070 brings me to the ASUS ROG Strix Motherboard

 

[landonhofmeister]

I mean 1060 my bad

 

[landonhofmeister]

The GTX 970 brings me to this link https://www.amazon.com/ROG-Strix-Z270I-Gaming-Motherboards/dp/B01MZBUDUU?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=THUS1471510842560533&SubscriptionId=AKIAJLYKPRLXUSF4GDIQ&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953

 

[tobydjones]

Could you number the tiers please? It would make it easier to compare two cards.

 

[King_V]

Could you number the tiers please? It would make it easier to compare two cards.

How so? Isn't it obvious from the horizontal lines where the tiers are, and how many tiers apart any two cards are?

 

[tobydjones]

Could you number the tiers please? It would make it easier to compare two cards.

How so? Isn't it obvious from the horizontal lines where the tiers are, and how many tiers apart any two cards are?

The problem is that I don't know where the cards are, so I have to use CTRL-F to find them. I can only find one at a time, so I don't know how many tiers apart they are (or even which is better).

For example, imagine I have a 5450. I search for it and find it somewhere in the middle of the table. I find a 6450 on ebay and I want to know if it's better. If I search for it, it's also in middle of the table, but now I don't know where the 5450 is, so I can't compare them. However if, when I searched, I had found that the 5450 was in tier 27 and the 6450 in tier 22, it would be obvious which was better.

 

[pmcmann1027]

The GTX 960 is on this list twice, at two very different tiers. Just a heads up

 

[King_V]

Could you number the tiers please? It would make it easier to compare two cards.

How so? Isn't it obvious from the horizontal lines where the tiers are, and how many tiers apart any two cards are?

The problem is that I don't know where the cards are, so I have to use CTRL-F to find them. I can only find one at a time, so I don't know how many tiers apart they are (or even which is better).

For example, imagine I have a 5450. I search for it and find it somewhere in the middle of the table. I find a 6450 on ebay and I want to know if it's better. If I search for it, it's also in middle of the table, but now I don't know where the 5450 is, so I can't compare them. However if, when I searched, I had found that the 5450 was in tier 27 and the 6450 in tier 22, it would be obvious which was better.

Fair enough, I could see that being an issue, particularly if they're far enough apart to require scrolling, but close enough where using the scroll-bar's position is difficult (too close to tell with scroll bar)

 

[jkarapeovski5]

You made a type. GTX960 bellow GTX980 should be corrected to GTX690.

 

[dranicite]

the price for your vega gpu is incorrect as the link you shared is for a bundled gpu, cpu and motherboard not tthe video card by itself. here is the video card by itself https://www.amazon.com/XFX-Radeon-Graphic-Cards-RX-VEGMTBFX6/dp/B074DK6NHQ/ref=bdl_pop_ttl_B074DK6NHQ

 

[King_V]

RX 580 is now mislabeled as RX 550, and links to an Amazon page for the 550?

(but there is also a correctly located entry for the RX 550)

 

[themrsbusta]

295x2 is fast as Vega 64/GTX 1080 and where is Titan Z?

 

[lisowin]

What? R9 380 on NVidia's side? And no gTX980?

 

[wincostco]

Why is the GTX 980 on a separate tier from the 1060 (6gb)? I've seen a bit of side-by-side benchmarks between the two cards and the 1060 actually beats it by a few fps on more games than not.

 

[Co BIY]

I would like to see how Intel HD 630 (Or UHD 630) stack up against the low end.

I understand that testing integrated graphics might be challenging but it'll need to be done when AMD rolls out it's new APUs.

 

[bill.taipei]

Why GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) 3 tiers higher than its 128-bit version?

 

[King_V]

To be honest, I knew that there was a DDR3 version of the 128 bit 730, but I never knew there was a GDDR5 version of the 128 bit. Can't seem to find any info about it.

I wonder if the GT 730 128-bit GDDR5 is a real one, or a mistake.

 

[Co BIY]

Why GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) 3 tiers higher than its 128-bit version?

The 128 bit had 96 CUDA cores while the 64 bit versions had 384 CUDA cores.

It was clear case of naming malfeasance.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-gt-730-announcement,27087.html