I don't see the point of using harsh word for justify their product. Simply they good, we praise, they bad, we blame, thus they improve their product, yours is beyond mock and grude
I don't see the point of using harsh word for justify their product. Simply they good, we praise, they bad, we blame, thus they improve their product, yours is beyond mock and grude
You must not have played D3 recently then. It honestly is in bad shape and they continue to change things around, 180 and even with just the patch 2.0, its not as good as it could be.
RoS adds some new stuff but not a lot, and adds in features that should have been in D3 vanilla but wont be.
The way it is shaping up is that D3 will be a demo for RoS. If you play the PTR right now for Loot 2.0, you see all the stuff for RoS in your face but cannot access any of it. That's how it will be on release. Thus D3 vanilla is now a demo for the RoS expansion.
Honestly, I am excited for this. D3 pretty much destroyed the Diablo legacy, but this seems to bring things somewhat back (or remove unwanted features and restrictions).
The general gameplay of D3 wasn't bad imo, they just ruined it with a) AH and bad drop rates, b) useless difficulty mode(would have been fine had it not contained special drops), c) not very good level design (less random, but replaced that with nothing, add more caves etc.!) d) sucky leveling system (why must lvl60 be a desirable and easily reachable goal, which you later have to fix anyways by copying HG:L perks? I find it kind of funny how these people insulted HG:L devs and then copy them when they have the exact same problem)
edit: should add that the uninspiring unique items did not help, as they were neither powerful or really unique, while rare items should be potentially more powerful than unique ones, the player should always have a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction when seeing a unique drop, this wasn't the case
edit2: also D3 story was ridiculous and storytelling was childlike
$40 for one act is an utter joke. If it was $10 id buy it, maybe for 15, but 40 is just too much of a joke for me to bother. Half of the expansion are things that should have been there on release. Thanks, but no thanks blizzard.
For $15's someone can buy Skyrim. It's got better game play, music, graphics, and support for modding. I have to agree this sounds like it's worth maybe $10's max in fact it's closer to $5's.
Even then I wouldn't buy it after having bought D3 and seen what a mess that's turned out to be and I'm certain it's still a mess. I wouldn't play it if it were free at this point not worth the installation requirement to hell with suicide entertainment.
I like D3. I'm getting this expansion right away. Of course, I didn't pay for the first one because I'm an avid WoW player. The biggest disappointment is that I'll be able to get this before I get to see season 3 of Game of Thrones, which comes out on BluRay in April.
D3 should be scraped - go back to drawing board: 1) offline single player, 2) online LAN no DRM, 3) offline cheat ok but disable achievements (no ban), 4) PvP 8 vs 8 just like D2. Then add your current features.
Buying D3 is one of the biggest mistakes of my life, I regret it every day and it will be a cold day in hell before they get another dime from me for an always connected single player game.
The game was a let down for me, but I did have fun playing it. $40 is a bit steep for a game that underwowed me with its size. I guess I will pass until they drop the price to $20.
I think we can all agree that Diablo is better without Jay Wilson & hopefully the xpac will return life to the franchise that deserves a chance. I believe most people liked playing Diablo initially, its the re-playability that was a problem, and unfortunately allot of decisions from Wilson were bad calls.