Question Did I win silicon lottery?

[Unolocogringo]

Asus Prime x570-p
R5 3600
2x8 Corsair Vengence 3600 Cas18
256gig Micron 1100 m.2
1TB 970 Evo plus m.2
Hyper 212 EVO
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
Corsair RM850x

I expected 1 or 2 core boost to 4.2ghz.
With PBO and core boost enabled in bios all cores boost to 4.2 in all benchmarks.
They start out in P95 @ 4.2 and slowly drop to 4.0 at 85c 1.36v
Benchmarks
Time Spy = 6584
Real bench = 155203
Cine bench R20 = 3603
CPUZ+ 503 single, 4165 multi
Did I get lucky or is this normal. I thought 4.2 was for 1 or 2 core boost not all 6?
Boosts and voltages checked with Ryzen Master.

 

[Isokolon]

AMD is producing these chips for a while now. they get better at it.
it's normal that early chips perform a bit worse than chips with a later date.
whether you won the silicon lottery or not is hard to say without seeing what kind of OC can be run stable, but looks like a decent chip (or at least a chip doing what it's supposed to)

 

[CountMike]

Asus Prime x570-p
R5 3600
2x8 Corsair Vengence 3600 Cas18
256gig Micron 1100 m.2
1TB 970 Evo plus m.2
Hyper 212 EVO
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
Corsair RM850x

I expected 1 or 2 core boost to 4.2ghz.
With PBO and core boost enabled in bios all cores boost to 4.2 in all benchmarks.
They start out in P95 @ 4.2 and slowly drop to 4.0 at 85c 1.36v
Benchmarks
Time Spy = 6584
Real bench = 155203
Cine bench R20 = 3603
CPUZ+ 503 single, 4165 multi
Did I get lucky or is this normal. I thought 4.2 was for 1 or 2 core boost not all 6?
Boosts and voltages checked with Ryzen Master.

That's standard boost speed, nothing special but most probably one core at a time.
Under benchmark it lowers core frequency because of high temperature, need to keep it under 70, preferably 65c to keep frequency high.

 

[Unolocogringo]

Tinkered a little last night and got all core boost to 4.4 through core boost override.
Benchmarks are within a margin of errors range.
Single /dual core boosts and multiple short boost to 4.4on all cores.

My computers run 24/7/365 so a static overclock is not optimal on Ryzen.
Each GPU uses 1 core for feeding it Folding@Home data. Allowing the other cores to idle or sleep cuts down on heat and temps while folding .
My old Phenom2 x6 needed a static of 3.6 to be more productive on the video cards. It needed a full core+ to max out the video card.
With a better cooler sustained higher clocks look possible on this chip

 

[Unolocogringo]

Got some time to tinker again