Difference in results (1700X VS 6900K)

[maswadeh]

hi all

My question is why there are big differences in results :

AMD RYZEN 1700X CINEBEANCH: 1537 VS INTEL CORE I7 6900K CINEBEANCH: 1540
AMD RYZEN 1700X PASSMARK:14,492 VS INTEL CORE I7 6900K PASSMARK: 17,732

What is the reason ?

 

[gamerk316]

Different benchmarks/workloads. Simple as that.

 

[maswadeh]

Different benchmarks/workloads. Simple as that.

Something wrong, in CINEBEANCH the tow cpu is same performance.
but in PASSMARK test ( i7 6900k faster than 22% ) and this is not small number !
can any one explain this issue plz ?

 

[Supahos]

Easy, passmark is still optimized only for Intel, cinebench isn't.

You'll run into this in other programs too. Some the 1700x will beat the ,6900 some will lose handily. As windows fixes it's scheduled to favor full cores over logical ones the number will go down, and as programs optimize for the 1700x I don't think many programs will favor the 6900k in multithreaded loads. If you have absolutely no budget get a 6900k if not the additional GPU/memory/ssds you can buy with the savings will make the 1700x system stronger overall