different CPU speeds

Status
Not open for further replies.

johnhelen

Distinguished
Jun 30, 2004
4
0
18,510
Hello all
I have a laptop computer. Following spec. it is 2.4 GHz. However, when I go to Control Panel/System/General, I saw two lines :
Intel(R) CPU 2.4GHz, and below is 1.05GHz.
Could you please help why there are two different values of CPU speeds and if there is a problem in that, please help
Thank you very much
Regards
S.H
 
1. Are you sure it is not 1.05 Gb of RAM (sorry, stupid q, but just incase)
2. Perhaps you have incorrectly set up your BIOS FSB wise

It would help if you listed your system specs.

My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.
 
If you're running in dual-channel with XP it could be showing you 2 X 1.05, but without the 2. I've seen it before.

"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. Now, let's eat!
 
It's probably telling you the maximum speed and current speed, P4-M's do multi-speed automatically to save power and reduce heat.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 
oh yeah,lol, i neglected to process the "laptop" part of the thread!

Yep, that is most likely the max/currect speeds as said above

*slaps head*

My dick is so big, that my dick has a dick. And my dicks' dick is bigger than yours.
 
Thank you all for your replies.
My computer has only 256Mb Ram. It is NEC versa M400. Pentium (M) 4, 2.4GHz and 30G hardisk.
Sometimes, it is 1.6GHz but normally, it is 1.05GHz. I do not know why
 
It is because of the CPU throttling as several people including myself have already said.

Go read this article to get an explanation, and see an extreme case of it:

<A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20021101/index.html" target="_new">http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20021101/index.html</A>
 
"Fails to mention". Reminds me of ATI's Radeon X800. Not only that it fails to mention that it's trilinear filtering is optimized, meaning it's only brilinear, but it says loudly and clearly that X800 uses trilinear filtering. Until someone proves the oposite. <A HREF="http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20040603/index.html" target="_new">If you wish to read more and see how ATI excuses it.</A>
 
Try making your CPU run at full power. Try some games or <A HREF="http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm" target="_new">Prime95</A> perhaps.
 
yup run something that gets your cpu to 100% utilisation like MrNUke said. Also make sure your plugged in the wall, the CPU might not go full speed if your on batteries.
Fianlly you can use an applications like CPU-Z CPuid, it will tell you your clock speed and other info more reliably than windows.

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-3-3-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0
 
OCZ you say? Try messing with the timings, they're very flexible on OCZ modules, try for example 2-3-3-6 and then 2-3-2-6, 2-3-2-5, I don't know If it can go any lower, but you can try, if they're too low, it won't boot, the modules are safe.
 
Depends on the module.
Because these modules contain special PCB’s and firmware to allow the module to run at the highest possible frequencies, timings lower than CL 3-4-4-8 may not be possible, regardless of the module frequency.
From OCz website, thats for their Performance "copper" wich is the ram I use.

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-3-3-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0
 
I know lots of OCZ modules CL 2.5-3-3-7 the run @ 2-2-2-5, perfectly stable. And even if you mess with the timings your RAM is fine, it won't get fried or anything. The PC will not boot if the timings are too low, so you can try see how far your modules go.

OCZ says it cannot go lower then 3-4-4-8, but yours go with 3-3-3-8.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.