Some points:
1. The Active Adapter linked above appears correct.
- it contains a DAC which must get power direct from the graphics card.
*However, is it possible that some DP connections don't have enough power to drive this directly? If so, you'd need one using an AC adapter instead.
2. No DVI-I on the card:
Probably obvious to the OP, but there are NO analog outputs on this card. Normally you get either a VGA connector only or a DVI-I; In the case of DVI-I there are both separate pins for Digital and Analog; the VGA "adapter" in this case simply connects to the VGA outputs.
(Whether VGA or the VGA path in DVI-I, these are all connected back to DVI through a Digital-to-Analog Converter chip or DAC. Modern cards drop this to save money as monitors that only have VGA are pretty rare now.)
3. No "setup" necessary using a DAC.
4. What OUTPUT combinations are actually supported?
Often not all combinations are supported so depending on the other monitors used it's unclear. My guess is it should work but I'm not certain.
5. Lack of handshaking an issue?
For VGA there's usually (always?) no communication back to the computer to identify itself and its capabilities. Therefore if you have an incorrect setting the monitor may not show any data.
Also, do you need the same REFRESH RATE for triple monitors? (I'm not sure) but if the VGA is a higher refresh rate that may also be an issue.
6. Buy a cheap VGA card?
Summary:
My main guess is you need a powered adapter.
My second guess is a compatibility issue, possibly refresh rate. Also, it's not clear if this is setup as SEPARATE monitors or one VIRTUAL screen. The virtual setup is much pickier.
My main suggestion is something like an HD6450 fanless graphics card if using screen as a SECONDARY monitor. Not only would you use its own video memory (and avoid using some of the R9-290X memory) but it's almost guaranteed to work unlike buying another adapter.