zipz0p
Distinguished
^Agreed - and that's basically the point I wanted to make - the idea isn't inherently dangerous or bad or evil. Humans could distort it in that way, possibly, but this one seems relatively safe to me at the moment.
Also, just for clarity: DNA doesn't do work. The enzymes it codes do work, using chemical energy in the form of ATP (mostly). I think this "requiring no energy" thing is hocus pocus. It requires energy, as does all work. It's just in a different form. It won't run on petroleum, but it might run on ATP, or if integrated into simple cells, those could run on glucose, and produce the ATP necessary. Note that we already do this kind of thing! We inject specific genes into certain strains of e. coli and let them make up a whole lot of the protein we're interested in. This is how we mass-produce insulin for diabetics. It's a great tool, and I hope that it is used to produce more things as we learn how to manipulate the DNA strands, so that we can have the e. coli workers produce lots of helpful proteins for us!
Also, just for clarity: DNA doesn't do work. The enzymes it codes do work, using chemical energy in the form of ATP (mostly). I think this "requiring no energy" thing is hocus pocus. It requires energy, as does all work. It's just in a different form. It won't run on petroleum, but it might run on ATP, or if integrated into simple cells, those could run on glucose, and produce the ATP necessary. Note that we already do this kind of thing! We inject specific genes into certain strains of e. coli and let them make up a whole lot of the protein we're interested in. This is how we mass-produce insulin for diabetics. It's a great tool, and I hope that it is used to produce more things as we learn how to manipulate the DNA strands, so that we can have the e. coli workers produce lots of helpful proteins for us!