I am not showing hostility just asking from proof. Whenever you make statements like those your misleading people who may see this post.
So please.
1) Show proof.
2) Know what your talking about.
3) At least show a logical step by step of why Microsoft would benefit from said NSA backdoor.
I am very open minded, so if you can present some solid proof we can go from there.
I am not saying anything happening now is what matters, and the past doesnt. What I am saying is your article was very outdated with several updates leading up to 2004 with the acceptance of the appeal to the anti trust case.
What I am saying is give me the most current event having to do with your topic. For example if I say the newest GPU by ATI was a HD 4650, that would be right /wrong. Right because it was once the newest GPU way back when, and wrong because current events changed the newest GPU.[/quotemsg]
I would respectfully like to know how I can prove my dilemma. On occasion and with sound mind and body, whenever I'm alone the electronic devices around me( iPod, car radio, CD player) can play what they want. For instance, my brother can override my cd and straight tell me whatever he wants. The drones are making sure nobody is in distance when it happens in automated fashion. How can I prove this ? I have recordings, but they need to be analyzed. More importantly, electronic devices need to be cracked to show the public that its true. How can we prove that the hidden chips or software give NSA agents override authority? And how can I prove that the drones are signaling these devices to be active when the victim is isolated? Yea, I'm for real and they are killing me already, they don't like thee secrets to be revealed