Hey Guys,
So I recently bought Ghost Recon Wildlands and was, therefore, playing it on my [censored] poor (Very) 1080p TN panel/TV. I noticed even on the Ultra preset the trees looked absolutely appalling (as it does on many other games). So I went on my MacBook Pro (2560x1600 IPS) and watched a 1080p video of Ghost Recon Wildlands. The trees looked fantastic as I expected from such a new game. So I started to wonder is the quality of my 1080p panel just terrible, and if I upgraded to a higher quality TN 1080p MONITOR (An ASUS VG245H is what I was planning on getting) the trees would look like they did on my Mac. I also thought, being a higher resolution, YouTube would somehow upscale the 1080p video to match the resolution of my Mac and creating the tree quality I was after. But I though YouTube was meant to decrease the video quality from the original video for compression. Do I have an issue with trees, or is it something to do with the two resolutions? This may affect my purchase of my next monitor.
Thanks
So I recently bought Ghost Recon Wildlands and was, therefore, playing it on my [censored] poor (Very) 1080p TN panel/TV. I noticed even on the Ultra preset the trees looked absolutely appalling (as it does on many other games). So I went on my MacBook Pro (2560x1600 IPS) and watched a 1080p video of Ghost Recon Wildlands. The trees looked fantastic as I expected from such a new game. So I started to wonder is the quality of my 1080p panel just terrible, and if I upgraded to a higher quality TN 1080p MONITOR (An ASUS VG245H is what I was planning on getting) the trees would look like they did on my Mac. I also thought, being a higher resolution, YouTube would somehow upscale the 1080p video to match the resolution of my Mac and creating the tree quality I was after. But I though YouTube was meant to decrease the video quality from the original video for compression. Do I have an issue with trees, or is it something to do with the two resolutions? This may affect my purchase of my next monitor.
Thanks