NurseMSIC

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2001
250
0
18,780
For gaming only, its arguably a disadvantage to have dual processors.

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=18108" target="_new">http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=18108</A>
 

baldurga

Distinguished
Feb 14, 2002
727
0
18,980
To take profit of dual processors (at least, noticeable), software should take advantage of it. And guess it, games don't take into account. Only if you work rendering 3D and such kind of professinal applications, you will benefit from dual. So, save your money or invest it other components.

DIY: read, buy, test, learn, reward yourself!
 

HokieESM

Distinguished
Apr 22, 2002
34
0
18,530
As the previous posters mentioned, for gaming, dual processing offers little benefit. BUT, there are some interesting side benefits that I've learned of recently. I have a dual PIII Xeon system at my home at the moment (to do some work), and some people have given me some interesting programs that allow the RAM to be partitioned. If you have enough (this machine has 1 GB), you can partition the RAM, and run the processes independently on the processors.... so with a dual monitor setup, you can leave ICQ, web browsers, newsgroups, whatever running (and/or downloading) while you play the game on the other monitor.

But, to sum up this much-to-long diatribe.... its probably a very small advantage for gaming... one that costs entirely too much.
 

Spiritof55

Distinguished
May 5, 2002
33
0
18,530
Thanx for the info everyone. I considered a dual system but now realize it probably isn't worth the extra cost...especially for games.
 
Best thing you could do if you're building a gaming machine is to take the cash you had set aside for the extra processor and use it to buy the best graphics card you can afford.

<b><font color=blue>~ What do you mean "It isn't working!"...Now where's my sonic screwdriver? ~ </font color=blue></b>