I keep reading variations on this. I appreciate that it may have some worth as a 'rule of thumb', but only if you take the rule to apply specifically to either intel or amd, but not both, then withn either chosen category to simlary-priced manufacturers.
I can justify this comment with 2 facts: 1) comparably-performing cpus vary considerably in price between intel and amd. (I acknowledge that this is not clear cut because some consider that AMD don't really have equivalents to some intel cpus. However, this is generally supported by the popular opinion that you get more 'bang for your buck' from amd.)
2) same design reference gpus vary considerably in price between manufacturers.
Here is one example. Even clock speed doesn't seem related to price here.
http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/parts/video-card/#c=71&sort=a6
I was initially going to start a thread completely blasting suggestions that your gpu should cost x% more than your cpu. But I realised that you might be able to configure the above parameters to make such a formula workable.
What I don't know is how you would do this. How could you narrow the focus to make this work? Or is it just impossible? Is there any sense available from these 150%-200% comments or are they just trosh?
All opinions welcomely received!
Cheers.
I can justify this comment with 2 facts: 1) comparably-performing cpus vary considerably in price between intel and amd. (I acknowledge that this is not clear cut because some consider that AMD don't really have equivalents to some intel cpus. However, this is generally supported by the popular opinion that you get more 'bang for your buck' from amd.)
2) same design reference gpus vary considerably in price between manufacturers.
Here is one example. Even clock speed doesn't seem related to price here.
http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/parts/video-card/#c=71&sort=a6
I was initially going to start a thread completely blasting suggestions that your gpu should cost x% more than your cpu. But I realised that you might be able to configure the above parameters to make such a formula workable.
What I don't know is how you would do this. How could you narrow the focus to make this work? Or is it just impossible? Is there any sense available from these 150%-200% comments or are they just trosh?
All opinions welcomely received!
Cheers.