A user from Taiwan test drives Intel's eight-core Tiger Lake-H.
Eight-Core Tiger Lake-H Processor Spotted : Read more
Eight-Core Tiger Lake-H Processor Spotted : Read more
The point of this article is to inform people that Tiger Lake H is out in the wild and being tested. The article makes no reference to the scores and no one cares what they are from an early engineering sample.AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!
Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.
Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series
Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!
Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.
Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series
Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...
AMD's 4000 line of CPUs completely destroy Intel's in virtually all multi-core tests and basically ties in single threaded workloads.
The fact that Toms is referencing Userbenchmark is deplorable, as Userbenchmark is almost universally known as Intel Shills!
Look at the ratings of the 5900x and 5950x: Despite that every hardware reviewer that I've seen (Paul's harware, Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus, Jarod's Tech, PC benchmarks, Hardware Cannuck, etc) has said that these processors are vastly superior to what Intel is offering and yet on Userbenchmark the Intel 10900k is better than both.
Userbenchmark - the only ones who have the 10900k better than AMD 5000 series
Another example of Toms being an Intel shill... Userbenchmark should be taken with a grain of salt... Next they'll use Bapco Sysmark in their benchmarks again...