Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (
More info?)
Memnoch wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:57:51 GMT, Troll <newstroll@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>Alfie [UK] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:45:23 -0000, "Morgan Sales"
>>><msales.DIESPAMMER@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>You can't really say that Lucas doesn't understand the franchise seeing as
>>>>he wrote the bloody films.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I think the problem most of the older fans have is that they grew up
>>>with it, as pre-teen or young teenage boys, from when Ep IV came out (I
>>>was seven).
>>>
>>>Lucas was aiming at the pre-teen/young teen market from the start and
>>>has continued in that vein, maybe lowering the age-sight a little, and
>>>the older fans feel that the franchise hasn't grown with them.
>>>
>>>Lucas never intended that it should grow up. If you ever saw any of the
>>>interviews with him back then (1977) he talked about it exactly the same
>>>way as he does now about the new films, like he's pitching to 8-14 year
>>>olds. All he's done is update his original story ideas using current
>>>technological abilities to turn it into movies, and in the differences
>>>between Original and Special Editions of Eps IV-VI you can see how he
>>>had to scale his original ideas back because of technological
>>>constraints.
>>>
>>>I think any hints of the darker side, or the more adult humour, came
>>>mostly from the actors themselves, particularly Harrison Ford, who
>>>supposedly liked to 'do things his way' once he became Hollywood
>>>hot-property and realised that he had some clout.
>>>
>>>The only real problem I've ever had with the franchise is that Lucas
>>>should stop trying to have so much input on the dialog and let a decent
>>>script writer at it, but I doubt that will ever happen.
>>>
>>
>>That would also help to avoid unnecessary (and mind-bogglingly stupid)
>>items like metachlorians (sp?) and a political system that has an
>>elected monarchy (?!?) where 14 year olds are the most compelling
>>candidates (one suspects that maybe the Gungans are *not* the dumbest
>>things that walk on two legs on Naboo). IMO, those all make the "it's
>>the ship that did the Kessel run in under 12 parsecs" line look like it
>>was written by Stephen Hawking.
>
>
> I thought that line had been explained. Something about it not being a
> accidental use of a measurement of distance used in place of one of time but
> that the Kessel run was something you could navigate i.e. you could take
> different routes from London to Cambridge.
Right. The idea is that there is a black hole near Kessel. If you do
it in 12 parsecs you come awfully close the the black hole...Usually the
Kessel run in 16 parsecs.