Experimental radiator \build log!!!

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

toolmaker_03

Honorable
Mar 26, 2012
2,650
0
12,960
well here are the radiators, my problem is the configuration of them, simply too many possibilities, so if you could find the time to give your opinions, I would really appreciate it.
I also need advice on a type of shroud for the radiators, the purpose is to inshore good air flow through the radiator.
and lastly how to attach the fans to the radiators?



all advice is welcome and thank you

 
Solution
I don't use a flow meter, never have, never will.

Having a picture of a flow meter does nothing to support a finding, especially when you cannot be 100% conclusive that it is reading correctly or you are accurately converting what is being reported. Does the flow meter registering on the pump without restriction show a flow rate that is close to the rated flow of the pump with your conversion?

If so, great, but if so, you're still running lower than 1.0 gpm on your loop, meaning your delta-T MUST be offset to calculate your cooling potential. Meaning - you have to over-rad to accomplish the same cooling ability that you could achieve with a higher flow. Adding cost of 3x 360 radiators ($60, example) starts to get expensive...



Aren't you running a 6X 1100T AMD Black Edition CPU, as listed in your sig?

Why are you raising the core speed?

It's an unfricking locked multiplier CPU!

The AMD Black Edition Overclock Guide will also work with your 6 core CPU.

You're causing your instability.

Don't come back with a long explanation why you think your way is better, you're overclocking now and you're in my territory.
 
ok so do not mess with the core speed then how do you get the ram speed up? or do i need to, i have read that slower speeds with tighter setting will give better results?
as far as clocking this i would like the help, i do want to see the best that this can give me.

i was only doing what i know how to do, not what is best for this computer there are so many things i can do that i have left a lot of it alone untail i know what it means and what it does and why.
 
this board has the extreme tweek screene in the BIOS i have more controll over how this board runs than i have ever had before so i do not know what to do with all of it yet maybe you could help.
i have read the clocking by the multiplyer threed several times, i jist thought that was only one half of it, sorry 4ryan6 I did not know any better.
based my knowledge on the K7 and 939 builds I have, but this one has a lot more to it.
 
Just follow the guide TM03, it has worked for thousands of people, before I rewrote and re-posted it, it had accumulated over 80,000 reads, I've lost count of the Thank You PMs, from people using it.

Trust me it will get you where you want to go, if you follow it. Ry
 
ok so here is the question is this system ganged or not?
the bios allowes me to ungang the memory so if i increase the CPU multi that incerasess the mem speed too regardless?
and the NB is still affected as well if the CPU multi is raised?
i have noticed that as i clock the CPU by the multi that i need to increase the NB voltage but not the HT speed why?
as well at 21.5X the memory wanted to run at 800 not 1066 so if i increase the voltage and relax the timmings on the mem it might help?

and no it's not stable, so my way is not better, it's not better at all.
 
here is good example of what i mean at stock the CPU wants 1.47volts and the NB is at 1.24volts but at 18.5X it wants 1.58volts on the CPU there is a (.6 voltage ref)the NB wants to run at the same voltage as the processor at 1.58volts this voltage will take me to 20.5X before i need to increase it again but it seems a little high to me but it is stable and will play games so i let it be.

i have been playing with it both ways to see what happens but it does seem to be more stable with only multi clocks on the CPU.
 


Sounds to me like you've still got something on Auto instead of MANUALY controlled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :pt1cable: :pfff:
 


This is not about what it wants!

This is about what you manually set! and make it do, what you want!

You aren't even using the guide are you?
 
I wrote the guide, because I just don't have the patience to hold your hand and walk you through your overclock.

I did have the patience to spend weeks of writing, testing, research, and rewriting, the guide, so you would have the information available to you, to help yourself.

The best thing for you to do is clear the CMOS of all your settings and start from scratch.
 


You have to follow the guide 100% for it to work as written, you don't just pick the parts of the guide you want to use and disregard the rest of it, or it won't work for you.

If there's motherboard terminology in it you do not understand, that's what Google is for!
 
stil workng on geting all of the maual settings for my BIOS.

about 15 places still in auto with no known settng for them yet.

** edit ok I have it all in manual now and I have clocked the processor to 3.7GHz 1.57Vcore and 1.38V on the NB it went down a little by setting it to all manual control but the processor still seems a little high to me but at lower settings for the voltage it does not hold stable **
 
Ok so after playing for 6 hours on the computer the water does not get over 100 F or if I crank the fans it stays at 92 F but the video stills goes to 135 F at times during game play and the processor will go to 135 F for a second than drop back to 125 F and the mobo stays at 125 F under load and the rest is at 100 F or at 92 F the same as the water is this good or should it be better?