• Happy holidays, folks! Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Tom's Hardware community!

Firefox Getting GPU Acceleration, Maybe Before IE9

Status
Not open for further replies.
Damn, very impressive impovements on a decent processor. The effect should be magnified on weaker processors and I hope will give Netbooks with Ion a bit of surfing power.
 
cooldudeawesome!

It's interesting to see that youtube didn't get a boost. Perhaps because it relies on connection speed more? It also depends on what you define as rendered; are the video loads counted toward that?
 
great news, I'm glad to see more and more commonly used applications taking advantage of GPU acceleration to improve system performance, even if its just a matter of ms. and i agree, we should see an even greater performance boost for ion netbook users.
 
With this and Flash being also GPU accelerated, I can finally have several tabs from one session to another without waiting so much time! It's good news in general, and about time, sites are getting more and more complex, all the processing power that our pc's have should be put to good use!
 
how about power usage? huh? meh, can't complain about that anyway, thats progress. good to see. and a million netbooks around the world together weeped. (as they should!)

I thought the term Direct2D died out at the turn of the century? pretty sure you just have to use Direct3D in 2D.

GDI sucked on XP, when it was hardware accelerated, but it wasn't even hw accelerated in vista or win 7?

I'd dare say that just bypassing GDI and direct software rendering to the window buffer would be fast enough, especially on a 920. my Wolfenstein clone ran at 100s of frames a second using that method.

I mean, its good to see them using all the processing power, just as long as it can fall back to software methods. for instance, you could get problems like not being able to run direct X programs across remote desktop.
 
I'd like to see power consumption charts on GPU-assisted vs non GPU-assisted renders. Which takes more power: everything on cpu, or some cpu and some gpu?
 
[citation][nom]falchard[/nom]Does this mean I can make a DirectDraw input using FireFox to make the best looking browser based game of all time?[/citation]

why would you want to? the point of a browser game is that it works on all the platforms the browser works on, Direct Draw or whatever is Windows only. be pretty much like making a windows game that also requires you to have firefox.

[citation][nom]supertrek32[/nom]I'd like to see power consumption charts on GPU-assisted vs non GPU-assisted renders. Which takes more power: everything on cpu, or some cpu and some gpu?[/citation]

would be interesting, but I'd say it would be pretty much the same as going from non aero glass to aero glass. vista and windows 7 wind up using more power than XP (though I'm not entirely sure if its because of this...).

 
[citation][nom]randomizer[/nom]What is on Google's home page that gains such a boost from acceleration when something as bloated and covered in images as Youtube does not?[/citation]
YouTube has videos. Google has text. Text is 2d, videos are directplay.
 
Great Browser based games are too rare.... Im talking about at least 8600gt or even 8800gt graphics type browser based games.... This would be great especially GPUs like Fermi or perhaps the 5800series being able to support and boost browser graphics and flash videos....
 
Anyone see the actual IE9 benchmarks? Even with GPU acceleration, its slower than some of the faster browsers. Granted, its probalby not even in the alpha stage yet, but still...You gotta wonder how fast the current fastest browsers would be with GPU acceleration...And once it becomes standard, if speed will become a moot point.
 
it is about time. I am not browsing around in a 633 celeron for any old reason. Damn, its been ten years of killing planet earth with motherboard piles of extinction. Time to wax the old hp6735....where did I go with that 233 anyway....
 
[citation][nom]groveborn[/nom]YouTube has videos. Google has text. Text is 2d, videos are directplay.[/citation]
Wouldn't video thumbnails (such as those on the home page) be counted as 2D? Also, Slashdot is all text and got barely any improvement.
 
[citation][nom]MU_Engineer[/nom]I wonder how many people didn't even see the graph or read the article but just clicked on the "Zoom" button below the girl in the Firefox tank top?[/citation]
How did you know?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.