- Jan 13, 2020
- 134
- 3
- 85
My old display was "4k" 3840x2160 resolution, with 60 Hz.
Games with vsync had a stable 60 FPS, i wanted more.
I dissabled vsnyc and had up to 300 FPS.
What i have been reading and hearing everywhere is, a display with 60 refresh rate cannot show more than 60 framesperseccond.
This might be true, or not.
The 300 FPS compared to the 60 FPS was an insane noticable diffrence for me.
The game was smooth to play in a way thats not possible with 60 Hz.
How can i notice the diffrence from 60 to 300 FPS, if my display was only 60hz?
Fact is 300 fps feels WAY smoother to play than 60, i dont understand tho why is that? cause my display cant show more than 60 pictures.
My new monitor is 165 Hz with 2k resolution. 2560x1440.
Im using it with 165 FPS max option in the nvidia control panel.
Most games wont go over 165 FPS anyways because gsync is on,
but some games could go to 300 FPS.
2560x1440 with 165 Hz 165 Fps
VS
2560x1440 with 165 Hz 300 Fps
Humans can notice the diffrence?
Games with vsync had a stable 60 FPS, i wanted more.
I dissabled vsnyc and had up to 300 FPS.
What i have been reading and hearing everywhere is, a display with 60 refresh rate cannot show more than 60 framesperseccond.
This might be true, or not.
The 300 FPS compared to the 60 FPS was an insane noticable diffrence for me.
The game was smooth to play in a way thats not possible with 60 Hz.
How can i notice the diffrence from 60 to 300 FPS, if my display was only 60hz?
Fact is 300 fps feels WAY smoother to play than 60, i dont understand tho why is that? cause my display cant show more than 60 pictures.
My new monitor is 165 Hz with 2k resolution. 2560x1440.
Im using it with 165 FPS max option in the nvidia control panel.
Most games wont go over 165 FPS anyways because gsync is on,
but some games could go to 300 FPS.
2560x1440 with 165 Hz 165 Fps
VS
2560x1440 with 165 Hz 300 Fps
Humans can notice the diffrence?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram