Free Anti-Virus Program

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...

http://free.grisoft.com/freeweb.php/doc/1/
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Road Runner wrote:
> AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...

"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got infected with a virus
which that program didn't stop

"André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Road Runner wrote:
>> AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
>
> "New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Road Runner wrote:
>> AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
>
> "New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!

André, why is Avast! V4.5 better than AVG V7.289?

Regards
Joe Steele
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

J&P wrote:
> André, why is Avast! V4.5 better than AVG V7.289?

I never tested 7.289, but in general I would point out two reasons to prefer
Avast! over AVG:

- Somewhat better virus detection record. For details take a look at
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/products.xml

- Much better automatic updates of virus definition files. AVGs autoupdate
is depending on the computer being powered on and connected to the internet
at a certain time every day. This is very inconvenient, especially (but not
only) for dialup users and casual computer users. The Avast! autoupdate is
completely transparent, and is performed automatically whenever a connection
to the internet is detected. This is not only convenient, but it is also
foolproof, which means a lot if you are setting up a computer that will be
used by family members that don't know anti virus software from rodent
repellent.

I have not yet found a single reason to prefer AVG over Avast!, so in my
book it's AVG-Avast! 0-2. So unless anybody can give me specific (and good!)
reasons to change back, I won't.

Oh, and speaking of free antivirus packages starting with the letter 'A':
Some years ago I tried Antivir from H+BDEV. However, this turned out to be a
dead loss. I hated the interface, and the virus detection record was a
complete disaster. The latter seems to have picked up this year, though.
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I'm afraid you are misinformed in regard to "AVGs autoupdate
is depending on the computer being powered on and connected to the internet
at a certain time every day." That's just not true.
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
news:OPI1cOozEHA.804@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I'm afraid you are misinformed in regard to "AVGs autoupdate
> is depending on the computer being powered on and connected to the
> internet
> at a certain time every day." That's just not true.
>

Thanks for the info, Papa. I do have a copy of AVG on one of my computers
which I update regularly, manually. I prefer it this way.

Regards
Joe Steele
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I'm with you J&P, I don't take automatic updates on anything.

I've used AVG for some time now, and am quite satisfied with it.

JAX

"J&P" <jopam@beeteeinternet.com> wrote in message
news:e16IsmozEHA.2624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
> news:OPI1cOozEHA.804@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> I'm afraid you are misinformed in regard to "AVGs autoupdate
>> is depending on the computer being powered on and connected to the
>> internet
>> at a certain time every day." That's just not true.
>>
>
> Thanks for the info, Papa. I do have a copy of AVG on one of my computers
> which I update regularly, manually. I prefer it this way.
>
> Regards
> Joe Steele
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Road Runner wrote:

> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got infected with a virus
> which that program didn't stop
>
> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
>>Road Runner wrote:
>>
>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
>>
>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!


Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?

RC
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Hey Roy ... To be totally honest I don't think there is a perfect Anti-Virus
program out there and I wouldn't take those survey that those website list
as to what is good and not so good , If I did, I would be using Norton and
I know I would never use Norton product ever again .... I rather though
have an Anti_Virus program that doesn't hog the resource like AVG , nor
does Avast but with Avast which I was using awhile ago I did get infected
with a Virus and it didn't catch it , So I move onto AVG which hasn't let me
down as of yet ... Knock on wood .... I did like the wishbone type
interface of Avast ... Companies that provide "Free" stuff should get our
high fives ...


"Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eCQQ%23PrzEHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Road Runner wrote:
>
>> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got infected with a virus
>> which that program didn't stop
>>
>> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
>> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>>>Road Runner wrote:
>>>
>>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
>>>
>>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!
>
>
> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?
>
> RC
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I agree...no "perfect" solution, no will there likely ever be. The closest
to being perfect is Norton AntiVirus, despite what the uneducated say about
it slowing a system down of hogging resources or the other BS they spew. I
have used NAV for years and it has never let me down.

As far as free AV goes...you get what you pay for...

AVG in particular always performs poorly in any valid testing I have ever
seen, and on the rare occasion I have used it, it failed to detect viruses
that were detected by NAV.

Bobby

"Road Runner" <beepbeep@9y.com> wrote in message
news:ud9alsrzEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hey Roy ... To be totally honest I don't think there is a perfect
> Anti-Virus program out there and I wouldn't take those survey that those
> website list as to what is good and not so good , If I did, I would be
> using Norton and I know I would never use Norton product ever again ....
> I rather though have an Anti_Virus program that doesn't hog the resource
> like AVG , nor does Avast but with Avast which I was using awhile ago I
> did get infected with a Virus and it didn't catch it , So I move onto AVG
> which hasn't let me down as of yet ... Knock on wood .... I did like the
> wishbone type interface of Avast ... Companies that provide "Free" stuff
> should get our high fives ...
>
>
> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eCQQ%23PrzEHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Road Runner wrote:
>>
>>> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got infected with a virus
>>> which that program didn't stop
>>>
>>> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
>>> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>>
>>>>Road Runner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
>>>>
>>>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!
>>
>>
>> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?
>>
>> RC
>
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I've used AVG for quite a while with exactly zero problems and no failures of
any kind. I reguarly replace failed/failing/misbehaving versions of Norton
on my customer's computers and they have never had any problems either.
I agree that no program is perfect, and there well may be others that
perform as well, but AVG has done the job for me.

"NoNoBadDog!" wrote:

> I agree...no "perfect" solution, no will there likely ever be. The closest
> to being perfect is Norton AntiVirus, despite what the uneducated say about
> it slowing a system down of hogging resources or the other BS they spew. I
> have used NAV for years and it has never let me down.
>
> As far as free AV goes...you get what you pay for...
>
> AVG in particular always performs poorly in any valid testing I have ever
> seen, and on the rare occasion I have used it, it failed to detect viruses
> that were detected by NAV.
>
> Bobby
>
> "Road Runner" <beepbeep@9y.com> wrote in message
> news:ud9alsrzEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hey Roy ... To be totally honest I don't think there is a perfect
> > Anti-Virus program out there and I wouldn't take those survey that those
> > website list as to what is good and not so good , If I did, I would be
> > using Norton and I know I would never use Norton product ever again ....
> > I rather though have an Anti_Virus program that doesn't hog the resource
> > like AVG , nor does Avast but with Avast which I was using awhile ago I
> > did get infected with a Virus and it didn't catch it , So I move onto AVG
> > which hasn't let me down as of yet ... Knock on wood .... I did like the
> > wishbone type interface of Avast ... Companies that provide "Free" stuff
> > should get our high fives ...
> >
> >
> > "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:eCQQ%23PrzEHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> Road Runner wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got infected with a virus
> >>> which that program didn't stop
> >>>
> >>> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
> >>> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >>>
> >>>>Road Runner wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all about it ...
> >>>>
> >>>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in favour of Avast!
> >>
> >>
> >> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?
> >>
> >> RC
> >
> >
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Papa wrote:
> I'm afraid you are misinformed in regard to "AVGs autoupdate
> is depending on the computer being powered on and connected to the
> internet at a certain time every day." That's just not true.

Yes it is. Of course you can update _manually_ whenever you want. If you
manage to connect to the Grisoft server, of course, which in my experience
can not always be counted on.
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Roy Coorne wrote:
> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?

No. But if I was going to pay for a AV software I'd probably take a look at
NOD32. From what I hear it is _the_ most system resource friendly AV out
there (unlike, say, Norton/Symantec), and it has a virus detection record
second to none.
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"André Gulliksen" <> wrote in message ...

> No. But if I was going to pay for a AV software I'd probably take a look
> at NOD32.. From what I hear it is _the_ most system resource friendly AV
> out there (unlike, say, Norton/Symantec), and it has a virus detection
> record second to none.


I hope NOD32 users will comment.

Regards
Joe Steele
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

NoNoBadDog then you should remove the hook that's inside
your mouth because you're a fish if you been using norton
for years . All those years getting rid off for paid such
a high price for Norton , while their is cheaper anti-
virus programs that do a better job . All i have to say
to you NoNoBadDog your're a FISH
>-----Original Message-----
>I agree...no "perfect" solution, no will there likely
ever be. The closest
>to being perfect is Norton AntiVirus, despite what the
uneducated say about
>it slowing a system down of hogging resources or the
other BS they spew. I
>have used NAV for years and it has never let me down.
>
>As far as free AV goes...you get what you pay for...
>
>AVG in particular always performs poorly in any valid
testing I have ever
>seen, and on the rare occasion I have used it, it failed
to detect viruses
>that were detected by NAV.
>
>Bobby
>
>"Road Runner" <beepbeep@9y.com> wrote in message
>news:ud9alsrzEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> Hey Roy ... To be totally honest I don't think there
is a perfect
>> Anti-Virus program out there and I wouldn't take those
survey that those
>> website list as to what is good and not so good , If I
did, I would be
>> using Norton and I know I would never use Norton
product ever again ....
>> I rather though have an Anti_Virus program that
doesn't hog the resource
>> like AVG , nor does Avast but with Avast which I was
using awhile ago I
>> did get infected with a Virus and it didn't catch it ,
So I move onto AVG
>> which hasn't let me down as of yet ... Knock on
wood .... I did like the
>> wishbone type interface of Avast ... Companies that
provide "Free" stuff
>> should get our high fives ...
>>
>>
>> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eCQQ%23PrzEHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> Road Runner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got
infected with a virus
>>>> which that program didn't stop
>>>>
>>>> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote
in message
>>>> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>>>
>>>>>Road Runner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all
about it ...
>>>>>
>>>>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in
favour of Avast!
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying
Kaspersky 5.0?
>>>
>>> RC
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

First, I guess you didn't read my post. Second, in any *INDEPENDENT* tests
I have read, nothing else came close to Norton Antivirus for effectiveness.
There were two other links posted in this thread that will take you to sites
that will verify this. On any machine that i have *EVER* used NAV on, I
have never had a virus. On *EVERY* computer that I have used that had *ANY
OTHER* antivirus, I have had infections. If you don't like Norton, then so
be it. I don't care what your preferences are. I know, from years of
experience, what works and what doesn't. Hope you like manually chasing
after and deleting viruses and worms, cause that's what you'll be doing.

Bobby

"dude" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7e1201c4cf50$f22c9d80$a601280a@phx.gbl...
NoNoBadDog then you should remove the hook that's inside
your mouth because you're a fish if you been using norton
for years . All those years getting rid off for paid such
a high price for Norton , while their is cheaper anti-
virus programs that do a better job . All i have to say
to you NoNoBadDog your're a FISH
>-----Original Message-----
>I agree...no "perfect" solution, no will there likely
ever be. The closest
>to being perfect is Norton AntiVirus, despite what the
uneducated say about
>it slowing a system down of hogging resources or the
other BS they spew. I
>have used NAV for years and it has never let me down.
>
>As far as free AV goes...you get what you pay for...
>
>AVG in particular always performs poorly in any valid
testing I have ever
>seen, and on the rare occasion I have used it, it failed
to detect viruses
>that were detected by NAV.
>
>Bobby
>
>"Road Runner" <beepbeep@9y.com> wrote in message
>news:ud9alsrzEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> Hey Roy ... To be totally honest I don't think there
is a perfect
>> Anti-Virus program out there and I wouldn't take those
survey that those
>> website list as to what is good and not so good , If I
did, I would be
>> using Norton and I know I would never use Norton
product ever again ....
>> I rather though have an Anti_Virus program that
doesn't hog the resource
>> like AVG , nor does Avast but with Avast which I was
using awhile ago I
>> did get infected with a Virus and it didn't catch it ,
So I move onto AVG
>> which hasn't let me down as of yet ... Knock on
wood .... I did like the
>> wishbone type interface of Avast ... Companies that
provide "Free" stuff
>> should get our high fives ...
>>
>>
>> "Roy Coorne" <rcoorne@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eCQQ%23PrzEHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> Road Runner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thats funny thats what I did with Avast when i got
infected with a virus
>>>> which that program didn't stop
>>>>
>>>> "André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote
in message
>>>> news:306desF2sbidpU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>>>
>>>>>Road Runner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>AVG has a new free Anti Virus program , Read all
about it ...
>>>>>
>>>>>"New"? I used this years ago, before dumping it in
favour of Avast!
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying
Kaspersky 5.0?
>>>
>>> RC
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Papa wrote:
> I was referring to the "at a certain time every day" stipulation.

What was wrong with that? The "automatic" update in AVG is not really
automatic; it is started at scheduled times by the software. If you are not
connected to the internet this operation will fail, and if the computer is
turned off the operation will not start at all. Thus, if AVG is scheduled to
look for updates at 7 AM every day and you never turn on your computer
before 8 AM AVG will never be automatically updated.

Yes, you _can_ configure AVG to connect to the internet if you are on
dialup, but even this is a far inferior solution to the one used in Avast!
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Well, all I can say is that I power up my system at irregular intervals,
sometimes I don't turn it on for hours, yet the updates keep coming. I'm on
cable.
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Hey there ... I myself use AVG Pro version which comes with 2 years update
definitions for the price that most other Anti-Virus programs give for one
year definitions .... And I believe that NOD32 does the same 2 years , which
i will keep in mind next time around ... Thanks for your post Andre

"André Gulliksen" <andre.gulliksen@start.no> wrote in message
news:308u86F2tnh6fU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Roy Coorne wrote:
>> Looking for the perfect road - have you been trying Kaspersky 5.0?
>
> No. But if I was going to pay for a AV software I'd probably take a look
> at NOD32. From what I hear it is _the_ most system resource friendly AV
> out there (unlike, say, Norton/Symantec), and it has a virus detection
> record second to none.
>
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

NAV, in my opinion, is an intrusive, bloated, and expensive program. I have
NEVER had a virus invade my 3 desktops and one laptop since using AVG, and I
have years of experience with PCs. As you may know, the user must take
several steps in order to protect against a virus. Using an AV program is
just one of them.